37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 231737 |
Time | |
Date | 199301 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : pdz airport : pom |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 5200 msl bound upper : 5200 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : ont tower : maf |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, Low Wing, 2 Eng, Retractable Gear |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | instruction : instructor |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : cfi pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 2250 flight time type : 40 |
ASRS Report | 231737 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | instruction : trainee |
Qualification | pilot : private |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : nmac other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 300 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Instructor and student in an small aircraft twin engine aircraft on an IFR training flight. We were at 5200 14 NM northwest of pdz VOR, in communication with ontario approach on 125.5, had received a clearance to maintain 5200 and proceed direct pdz. Cloud deck below us at approximately 3200 ft, conditions at altitude: clear. On frequency my student and I heard an airline comment 'boy, that was kind of close!' and then again, 'he was only 3 or 400 ft away from us.' approach's replay was 'roger' and nothing more. I could only feel we were the traffic in question and the carrier was departing ontario airport up through the cloud deck to approximately our area but below us. We never saw the traffic during or after this occurrence (and apparently ontario approach didn't either!). The moral to all this again is, no matter what sort of clearance you have and in VMC or IMC, our responsibility is always 'see and avoid.'
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLC ON AN INST TRAINING FLT HAD AN APPARENT NMAC WITH AN ACR ACFT WHILE OPERATING AT ASSIGNED ALT. TFC WAS NOT GIVEN TO RPTING PLT OR TO THE ACR ACFT.
Narrative: INSTRUCTOR AND STUDENT IN AN SMA TWIN ENG ACFT ON AN IFR TRAINING FLT. WE WERE AT 5200 14 NM NW OF PDZ VOR, IN COM WITH ONTARIO APCH ON 125.5, HAD RECEIVED A CLRNC TO MAINTAIN 5200 AND PROCEED DIRECT PDZ. CLOUD DECK BELOW US AT APPROX 3200 FT, CONDITIONS AT ALT: CLR. ON FREQ MY STUDENT AND I HEARD AN AIRLINE COMMENT 'BOY, THAT WAS KIND OF CLOSE!' AND THEN AGAIN, 'HE WAS ONLY 3 OR 400 FT AWAY FROM US.' APCH'S REPLAY WAS 'ROGER' AND NOTHING MORE. I COULD ONLY FEEL WE WERE THE TFC IN QUESTION AND THE CARRIER WAS DEPARTING ONTARIO ARPT UP THROUGH THE CLOUD DECK TO APPROX OUR AREA BUT BELOW US. WE NEVER SAW THE TFC DURING OR AFTER THIS OCCURRENCE (AND APPARENTLY ONTARIO APCH DIDN'T EITHER!). THE MORAL TO ALL THIS AGAIN IS, NO MATTER WHAT SORT OF CLRNC YOU HAVE AND IN VMC OR IMC, OUR RESPONSIBILITY IS ALWAYS 'SEE AND AVOID.'
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.