37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 243630 |
Time | |
Date | 199306 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : sts |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 400 msl bound upper : 400 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : sts artcc : sbmu |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, High Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
Flight Phase | descent : approach other |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, High Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | instruction : instructor |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : cfi pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 80 flight time total : 400 flight time type : 300 |
ASRS Report | 243670 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | instruction : trainee |
Qualification | pilot : student |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : nmac non adherence other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance flight crew : took evasive action |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 0 vertical : 150 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
I was flying into santa rosa airport from the east with a student. Tower told us to report a right base for runway 32, report crossing the freeway (highway 101). We reported crossing highway 101, and were cleared to land on runway 32. Before we made a right turn to final, my student and I looked left, and then turned final. As we leveled out our wings on final, we saw a high wing aircraft above us about 100-200 ft. He did not have us in sight. I pushed our nose forward, and continued to look out behind us. The airplane disappeared over us. We were now 1-2 mi from the end of the runway. I called tower and asked, 'is small aircraft a cleared to land?' to confirm our clearance. She paused, then said, 'small aircraft a, flash your landing light.' we did. 'Small aircraft a is clear to land, small aircraft B (the other plane) make a right 360 degree.' I confirmed our clearance one more time with the tower and proceeded to land without incident. The other aircraft landed after us and proceeded to parking. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following: reporter was not sure how the other aircraft came to be where he was. She tried, the next day, to listen to the tapes but was rebuffed. The tower supervisor told her that the controller involved had been counseled. A previous incident with the same controller on the same day caused another conflict with an inbound small transport on the west side of the airport. She said the controller 'wasn't having a good day.'
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: SMA HAS AN NMAC WHILE TURNING FROM BASE TO FINAL APCH. THE OTHER SMA WAS ALMOST DIRECTLY OVERHEAD.
Narrative: I WAS FLYING INTO SANTA ROSA ARPT FROM THE E WITH A STUDENT. TWR TOLD US TO RPT A R BASE FOR RWY 32, RPT XING THE FREEWAY (HWY 101). WE RPTED XING HWY 101, AND WERE CLRED TO LAND ON RWY 32. BEFORE WE MADE A R TURN TO FINAL, MY STUDENT AND I LOOKED L, AND THEN TURNED FINAL. AS WE LEVELED OUT OUR WINGS ON FINAL, WE SAW A HIGH WING ACFT ABOVE US ABOUT 100-200 FT. HE DID NOT HAVE US IN SIGHT. I PUSHED OUR NOSE FORWARD, AND CONTINUED TO LOOK OUT BEHIND US. THE AIRPLANE DISAPPEARED OVER US. WE WERE NOW 1-2 MI FROM THE END OF THE RWY. I CALLED TWR AND ASKED, 'IS SMA A CLRED TO LAND?' TO CONFIRM OUR CLRNC. SHE PAUSED, THEN SAID, 'SMA A, FLASH YOUR LNDG LIGHT.' WE DID. 'SMA A IS CLR TO LAND, SMA B (THE OTHER PLANE) MAKE A R 360 DEG.' I CONFIRMED OUR CLRNC ONE MORE TIME WITH THE TWR AND PROCEEDED TO LAND WITHOUT INCIDENT. THE OTHER ACFT LANDED AFTER US AND PROCEEDED TO PARKING. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH REPORTER REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: RPTR WAS NOT SURE HOW THE OTHER ACFT CAME TO BE WHERE HE WAS. SHE TRIED, THE NEXT DAY, TO LISTEN TO THE TAPES BUT WAS REBUFFED. THE TWR SUPVR TOLD HER THAT THE CTLR INVOLVED HAD BEEN COUNSELED. A PREVIOUS INCIDENT WITH THE SAME CTLR ON THE SAME DAY CAUSED ANOTHER CONFLICT WITH AN INBOUND SMT ON THE W SIDE OF THE ARPT. SHE SAID THE CTLR 'WASN'T HAVING A GOOD DAY.'
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.