37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 245185 |
Time | |
Date | 199306 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : mem |
State Reference | TN |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Large Transport, Low Wing, 3 Turbojet Eng |
Flight Phase | ground other : taxi other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : flight engineer pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 100 flight time total : 7000 flight time type : 3000 |
ASRS Report | 245185 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : commercial pilot : flight engineer pilot : instrument pilot : private |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 135 flight time total : 5000 flight time type : 2000 |
ASRS Report | 245348 |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other other : unspecified |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
During pushback and engine start, the tug driver was maneuvering to avoid some equipment on the ramp. Due to the congestion on the ramp, I was monitoring the outside progress of the aircraft. Unknown to me or my crew, the thrust levers had been moved slightly forward of the idle range. We did not notice that they were advanced approximately 1 knob width due to the fact that they were symmetrical. As the engines were started, and while being pushed back and maneuvered by the tug, forward thrust was produced as the engines spooled up. The tug driver was the first to notice the movement, and called for me to use the brakes and abort the start process. I did so, but not before the tow bar was damaged. (The aircraft, tug and ground personnel were all unharmed.) I will certainly in the future double-check, prior to pushback, to confirm that the thrust levers are indeed in idle. I have also suggested to my company that we institute a policy to make this step a procedure prior to telling the tug driver that it is clear to begin the pushback.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN ACR FLC STARTED THEIR ENGS WITH ALL THROTTLES ADVANCED 1 KNOB. THE TOW BAR WAS BENT.
Narrative: DURING PUSHBACK AND ENG START, THE TUG DRIVER WAS MANEUVERING TO AVOID SOME EQUIP ON THE RAMP. DUE TO THE CONGESTION ON THE RAMP, I WAS MONITORING THE OUTSIDE PROGRESS OF THE ACFT. UNKNOWN TO ME OR MY CREW, THE THRUST LEVERS HAD BEEN MOVED SLIGHTLY FORWARD OF THE IDLE RANGE. WE DID NOT NOTICE THAT THEY WERE ADVANCED APPROX 1 KNOB WIDTH DUE TO THE FACT THAT THEY WERE SYMMETRICAL. AS THE ENGS WERE STARTED, AND WHILE BEING PUSHED BACK AND MANEUVERED BY THE TUG, FORWARD THRUST WAS PRODUCED AS THE ENGS SPOOLED UP. THE TUG DRIVER WAS THE FIRST TO NOTICE THE MOVEMENT, AND CALLED FOR ME TO USE THE BRAKES AND ABORT THE START PROCESS. I DID SO, BUT NOT BEFORE THE TOW BAR WAS DAMAGED. (THE ACFT, TUG AND GND PERSONNEL WERE ALL UNHARMED.) I WILL CERTAINLY IN THE FUTURE DOUBLE-CHK, PRIOR TO PUSHBACK, TO CONFIRM THAT THE THRUST LEVERS ARE INDEED IN IDLE. I HAVE ALSO SUGGESTED TO MY COMPANY THAT WE INSTITUTE A POLICY TO MAKE THIS STEP A PROC PRIOR TO TELLING THE TUG DRIVER THAT IT IS CLR TO BEGIN THE PUSHBACK.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.