Potential conflict with arrival traffic in multiple runway operation parallel runways.

Attributes
ACN	280535
Time
Date	199408
Day	Fri
Local Time Of Day	0601 To 1200
Place
Locale Reference	airport : mia
State Reference	FL
Altitude	msl bound lower : 1500 msl bound upper : 2500
Environment
Flight Conditions	Mixed
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tracon : mia
Operator	common carrier : air carrier
Make Model Name	B727 Undifferentiated or Other Model
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 121
Flight Phase	descent : approach
Route In Use	enroute : on vectors
Flight Plan	IFR
Aircraft 2
Make Model Name	Commercial Fixed Wing
Operating Under FAR Part	other : unknown
Flight Phase	descent : approach
Route In Use	enroute : on vectors
Person 1
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : first officer
Qualification	pilot : cfi pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 260 flight time total : 6500 flight time type : 1000
ASRS Report	280535
Person 2
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : flight engineer pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : cfi pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 225 flight time total : 8100 flight time type : 1600
ASRS Report	281124
Events
Anomaly	conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : required legal separation non adherence : clearance non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other other spatial deviation
Independent Detector	aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified other controllera
Resolutory Action	flight crew : exited adverse environment flight crew : took evasive action
Consequence	Other
Miss Distance	horizontal : 15000 vertical : 500
Supplementary
Primary Problem	ATC Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	other
Situations
ATC Facility	procedure or policy : unspecified

Narrative:

On approach to mia (landing runway 9R), ATC assigned a 280 degree heading on downwind. ATC asked if we would accept a single heading to join the ILS to runway 9R. We accepted and were given a heading of 080 degrees to join the runway 9R localizer and were cleared for the ILS. I was the PF. Made my turn at a 30 degree (maximum suggested) bank angle and descended to 1500 ft. Because we were close in to the runway we overshot runway or centerline. As we corrected back to the centerline we got a TCASII TA. The TA was for an aircraft arriving for runway 9L from the north. TCASII then issued an RA with instructions to descend at 2500 FPM which we complied with. ATC asked if we had the traffic. We advised negative but we had traffic on TCASII approach then handed us off to tower and were cleared to land. Approach and tower made no mention to us of the incident.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: POTENTIAL CONFLICT WITH ARR TFC IN MULTIPLE RWY OP PARALLEL RWYS.

Narrative: ON APCH TO MIA (LNDG RWY 9R), ATC ASSIGNED A 280 DEG HDG ON DOWNWIND. ATC ASKED IF WE WOULD ACCEPT A SINGLE HDG TO JOIN THE ILS TO RWY 9R. WE ACCEPTED AND WERE GIVEN A HDG OF 080 DEGS TO JOIN THE RWY 9R LOC AND WERE CLRED FOR THE ILS. I WAS THE PF. MADE MY TURN AT A 30 DEG (MAX SUGGESTED) BANK ANGLE AND DSNDED TO 1500 FT. BECAUSE WE WERE CLOSE IN TO THE RWY WE OVERSHOT RWY OR CTRLINE. AS WE CORRECTED BACK TO THE CTRLINE WE GOT A TCASII TA. THE TA WAS FOR AN ACFT ARRIVING FOR RWY 9L FROM THE N. TCASII THEN ISSUED AN RA WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO DSND AT 2500 FPM WHICH WE COMPLIED WITH. ATC ASKED IF WE HAD THE TFC. WE ADVISED NEGATIVE BUT WE HAD TFC ON TCASII APCH THEN HANDED US OFF TO TWR AND WERE CLRED TO LAND. APCH AND TWR MADE NO MENTION TO US OF THE INCIDENT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.