37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 282451 |
Time | |
Date | 199409 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : lipa |
State Reference | FO |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 6000 msl bound upper : 24000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : csn |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B727 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach descent other landing other |
Route In Use | approach : visual enroute airway : lipa |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : flight engineer pilot : instrument pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 180 flight time total : 10000 flight time type : 1400 |
ASRS Report | 282451 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : far non adherence other other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa other other : unspecified |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : overcame equipment problem |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
During an ATC delayed descent into lipa (aub) on a military chartered flight. I briefed crew and FAA chkride person, cc, the approach and missed approach procedures. I failed to notice on approach plate 'TACAN azimuth required.' company aircraft do not have TACAN equipment, inspector point this out during briefing. I then contacted approach control, approximately 18000 ft, that we needed alternate missed approach procedures. During initial approach aircraft was still high so I requested a visual approach approximately 10-12 mi on final. Normal landing followed. Performance considerations: 1) duty time in previous 6 days approximately 70 plus hours. 2) flight time in previous 7 days approximately 40 hours. 3) inspectors demeanor -- very critical -- even to flight attendants.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ACFT NOT EQUIPPED FOR APCH AT MIL AIR BASE.
Narrative: DURING AN ATC DELAYED DSCNT INTO LIPA (AUB) ON A MIL CHARTERED FLT. I BRIEFED CREW AND FAA CHKRIDE PERSON, CC, THE APCH AND MISSED APCH PROCS. I FAILED TO NOTICE ON APCH PLATE 'TACAN AZIMUTH REQUIRED.' COMPANY ACFT DO NOT HAVE TACAN EQUIP, INSPECTOR POINT THIS OUT DURING BRIEFING. I THEN CONTACTED APCH CTL, APPROX 18000 FT, THAT WE NEEDED ALTERNATE MISSED APCH PROCS. DURING INITIAL APCH ACFT WAS STILL HIGH SO I REQUESTED A VISUAL APCH APPROX 10-12 MI ON FINAL. NORMAL LNDG FOLLOWED. PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS: 1) DUTY TIME IN PREVIOUS 6 DAYS APPROX 70 PLUS HRS. 2) FLT TIME IN PREVIOUS 7 DAYS APPROX 40 HRS. 3) INSPECTORS DEMEANOR -- VERY CRITICAL -- EVEN TO FLT ATTENDANTS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.