37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 284949 |
Time | |
Date | 199410 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : stl |
State Reference | MO |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 7000 msl bound upper : 7000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : stl |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Route In Use | arrival other arrival star : star enroute : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : cfi pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 180 flight time total : 16000 flight time type : 4200 |
ASRS Report | 284949 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : clearance other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance flight crew : returned to intended course or assigned course other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
My attention was divided and I did not have the 'approach picture.' approach control asked what my heading was, and what was I doing. I told him my heading for the transition and he said it was not the one we were using and gave me a heading to correct. What had happened was my first officer was on a radar vector heading and I told him to fly a transition heading not in use. Just prior to this and during, I was working on a landing distance problem for a non-standard runway suggested by approach control. I told him to stand by and he said never mind. He assigned a new runway. I had only been here 3 times before and heard him approve an aircraft larger than myself for the nonstandard runway. While working on those numbers I lost the picture. My decision to overload myself in a critical area was the problem.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: HDG TRACK DEV DURING A NON ADHERENCE TO ATC CLRNC INSTRUCTION.
Narrative: MY ATTN WAS DIVIDED AND I DID NOT HAVE THE 'APCH PICTURE.' APCH CTL ASKED WHAT MY HDG WAS, AND WHAT WAS I DOING. I TOLD HIM MY HDG FOR THE TRANSITION AND HE SAID IT WAS NOT THE ONE WE WERE USING AND GAVE ME A HDG TO CORRECT. WHAT HAD HAPPENED WAS MY FO WAS ON A RADAR VECTOR HDG AND I TOLD HIM TO FLY A TRANSITION HDG NOT IN USE. JUST PRIOR TO THIS AND DURING, I WAS WORKING ON A LNDG DISTANCE PROB FOR A NON-STANDARD RWY SUGGESTED BY APCH CTL. I TOLD HIM TO STAND BY AND HE SAID NEVER MIND. HE ASSIGNED A NEW RWY. I HAD ONLY BEEN HERE 3 TIMES BEFORE AND HEARD HIM APPROVE AN ACFT LARGER THAN MYSELF FOR THE NONSTANDARD RWY. WHILE WORKING ON THOSE NUMBERS I LOST THE PICTURE. MY DECISION TO OVERLOAD MYSELF IN A CRITICAL AREA WAS THE PROB.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.