37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 292500 |
Time | |
Date | 199412 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : den |
State Reference | CO |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 1000 agl bound upper : 1000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : den tower : den |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B727 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B727 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : flight engineer pilot : commercial pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 14500 flight time type : 9500 |
ASRS Report | 292500 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : nmac other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa other other : unspecified |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action other |
Consequence | Other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 500 vertical : 50 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
We were cleared for a visual approach to runway 26L to follow a company B757. A company B727 was to be along side for runway 26R. (Runways have approximately 1000 ft separation.) both aircraft were in sight at all times. Due to an approach control error, the other B727 was actually cleared for the visual to runway 26L also. We were approaching the extended centerline from the south, the other B727 from the north. As we began to converge (both aircraft angling to final) we began to sense something was wrong. Both aircraft switched to tower at the marker and blocked each other's initial transmission. By now we both realized the problem and we both began to break off toward runway 26R. Shortly thereafter, tower communications were established and everything was sorted out.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: NMAC.
Narrative: WE WERE CLRED FOR A VISUAL APCH TO RWY 26L TO FOLLOW A COMPANY B757. A COMPANY B727 WAS TO BE ALONG SIDE FOR RWY 26R. (RWYS HAVE APPROX 1000 FT SEPARATION.) BOTH ACFT WERE IN SIGHT AT ALL TIMES. DUE TO AN APCH CTL ERROR, THE OTHER B727 WAS ACTUALLY CLRED FOR THE VISUAL TO RWY 26L ALSO. WE WERE APCHING THE EXTENDED CTRLINE FROM THE S, THE OTHER B727 FROM THE N. AS WE BEGAN TO CONVERGE (BOTH ACFT ANGLING TO FINAL) WE BEGAN TO SENSE SOMETHING WAS WRONG. BOTH ACFT SWITCHED TO TWR AT THE MARKER AND BLOCKED EACH OTHER'S INITIAL XMISSION. BY NOW WE BOTH REALIZED THE PROB AND WE BOTH BEGAN TO BREAK OFF TOWARD RWY 26R. SHORTLY THEREAFTER, TWR COMS WERE ESTABLISHED AND EVERYTHING WAS SORTED OUT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.