Narrative:

We were cleared for a visual approach to runway 26L to follow a company B757. A company B727 was to be along side for runway 26R. (Runways have approximately 1000 ft separation.) both aircraft were in sight at all times. Due to an approach control error, the other B727 was actually cleared for the visual to runway 26L also. We were approaching the extended centerline from the south, the other B727 from the north. As we began to converge (both aircraft angling to final) we began to sense something was wrong. Both aircraft switched to tower at the marker and blocked each other's initial transmission. By now we both realized the problem and we both began to break off toward runway 26R. Shortly thereafter, tower communications were established and everything was sorted out.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: NMAC.

Narrative: WE WERE CLRED FOR A VISUAL APCH TO RWY 26L TO FOLLOW A COMPANY B757. A COMPANY B727 WAS TO BE ALONG SIDE FOR RWY 26R. (RWYS HAVE APPROX 1000 FT SEPARATION.) BOTH ACFT WERE IN SIGHT AT ALL TIMES. DUE TO AN APCH CTL ERROR, THE OTHER B727 WAS ACTUALLY CLRED FOR THE VISUAL TO RWY 26L ALSO. WE WERE APCHING THE EXTENDED CTRLINE FROM THE S, THE OTHER B727 FROM THE N. AS WE BEGAN TO CONVERGE (BOTH ACFT ANGLING TO FINAL) WE BEGAN TO SENSE SOMETHING WAS WRONG. BOTH ACFT SWITCHED TO TWR AT THE MARKER AND BLOCKED EACH OTHER'S INITIAL XMISSION. BY NOW WE BOTH REALIZED THE PROB AND WE BOTH BEGAN TO BREAK OFF TOWARD RWY 26R. SHORTLY THEREAFTER, TWR COMS WERE ESTABLISHED AND EVERYTHING WAS SORTED OUT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.