37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 315131 |
Time | |
Date | 199508 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : 4r1 |
State Reference | MS |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | other personnel other |
Qualification | other other : other pilot : cfi |
ASRS Report | 315131 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : ground critical non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other other : unspecified |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | faa : investigated other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation other |
Narrative:
I unknowingly allowed a friend to use (rent) my airplane past a 100 hour inspection. It appears now that the airplane was about 8-9 hours out of a 100 hour inspection with 2 airworthiness directives (visual inspections) overflown. This was discovered by the local FSDO upon inspection of the logbooks when the aircraft was involved in an incident (aircraft nosed over in soft dirt at the lumberton airport). This was an oversight on my part as I could and would have done the inspection myself (I'm an a & P). This was totally unintentional and was simply miscalculated by me.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN FAA INSPECTOR FOUND THAT 2 AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES HAD NOT BEEN PERFORMED.
Narrative: I UNKNOWINGLY ALLOWED A FRIEND TO USE (RENT) MY AIRPLANE PAST A 100 HR INSPECTION. IT APPEARS NOW THAT THE AIRPLANE WAS ABOUT 8-9 HRS OUT OF A 100 HR INSPECTION WITH 2 AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES (VISUAL INSPECTIONS) OVERFLOWN. THIS WAS DISCOVERED BY THE LCL FSDO UPON INSPECTION OF THE LOGBOOKS WHEN THE ACFT WAS INVOLVED IN AN INCIDENT (ACFT NOSED OVER IN SOFT DIRT AT THE LUMBERTON ARPT). THIS WAS AN OVERSIGHT ON MY PART AS I COULD AND WOULD HAVE DONE THE INSPECTION MYSELF (I'M AN A & P). THIS WAS TOTALLY UNINTENTIONAL AND WAS SIMPLY MISCALCULATED BY ME.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.