Fokker 100 lands on runway not authority/authorized by company.

Attributes
ACN	322840
Time
Date	199512
Day	Wed
Local Time Of Day	1201 To 1800
Place
Locale Reference	airport : sdf
State Reference	KY
Altitude	agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Operator	common carrier : air carrier
Make Model Name	Fokker 100
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 121
Navigation In Use	Other Other
Flight Phase	landing other
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 15000 flight time type : 2500
ASRS Report	322840
Person 2
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : first officer
Qualification	pilot : instrument pilot : commercial
Events
Anomaly	other anomaly other
Independent Detector	other flight crewa
Resolutory Action	none taken : detected after the fact
Consequence	Other
Supplementary
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

This was an uneventful landing on runway 17 at sdf. However, there was a company NOTAM not to use runway 17 until further notice. This is a new runway, and apparently there was no performance data in existence. The problem is, first, I didn't see the NOTAM, second runway 17 was the active runway, issued on ATIS and assigned by approach control. Additionally runway 17 was in our FMC database and we also had the approach charts for runway 17. It wasn't until we were preparing to depart sdf that I saw the NOTAM on runway 17. On taxi out tower assigned runway 17. It took 3 requests for runway 19 before runway 19 was given. I think until the runway is approved, approach charts and FMC data shouldn't be issued.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FOKKER 100 LANDS ON RWY NOT AUTH BY COMPANY.

Narrative: THIS WAS AN UNEVENTFUL LNDG ON RWY 17 AT SDF. HOWEVER, THERE WAS A COMPANY NOTAM NOT TO USE RWY 17 UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE. THIS IS A NEW RWY, AND APPARENTLY THERE WAS NO PERFORMANCE DATA IN EXISTENCE. THE PROB IS, FIRST, I DIDN'T SEE THE NOTAM, SECOND RWY 17 WAS THE ACTIVE RWY, ISSUED ON ATIS AND ASSIGNED BY APCH CTL. ADDITIONALLY RWY 17 WAS IN OUR FMC DATABASE AND WE ALSO HAD THE APCH CHARTS FOR RWY 17. IT WASN'T UNTIL WE WERE PREPARING TO DEPART SDF THAT I SAW THE NOTAM ON RWY 17. ON TAXI OUT TWR ASSIGNED RWY 17. IT TOOK 3 REQUESTS FOR RWY 19 BEFORE RWY 19 WAS GIVEN. I THINK UNTIL THE RWY IS APPROVED, APCH CHARTS AND FMC DATA SHOULDN'T BE ISSUED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.