37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 331610 |
Time | |
Date | 199603 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : sfo |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 6000 msl bound upper : 7000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : oak tower : phl |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | descent other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 20000 flight time type : 3000 |
ASRS Report | 331610 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | altitude deviation : excursion from assigned altitude other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Ambiguous |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
Descending out of 7000 ft to 6000 ft, on a radar vector to intercept the runway 28L localizer, the approach controller called to inform us our cleared altitude was 7000 ft, not 6000 ft, and our intercept radar heading was different than we were flying. Neither the first officer nor I remember hearing or reading back any other clearance than the one we were flying. We do not have any way to determine how the event arose, whether we missed a clearance, or one was not issued as the controller thought, or the clearance was accepted by another aircraft. Both pilots distinctly remember clearance to 6000 ft.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: MISCOM BTWN TRACON AND FLC. EITHER ANOTHER ACFT ANSWERED THE CLRNC GIVEN TO THE FLC OR THE CTLR THOUGHT HE HAD GIVEN IT, BECAUSE RPTR CAPT SAYS THAT NEITHER HE NOR HIS FO HEARD ANY OTHER CLRNC THAN WHAT THEY WERE FLYING.
Narrative: DSNDING OUT OF 7000 FT TO 6000 FT, ON A RADAR VECTOR TO INTERCEPT THE RWY 28L LOC, THE APCH CTLR CALLED TO INFORM US OUR CLRED ALT WAS 7000 FT, NOT 6000 FT, AND OUR INTERCEPT RADAR HDG WAS DIFFERENT THAN WE WERE FLYING. NEITHER THE FO NOR I REMEMBER HEARING OR READING BACK ANY OTHER CLRNC THAN THE ONE WE WERE FLYING. WE DO NOT HAVE ANY WAY TO DETERMINE HOW THE EVENT AROSE, WHETHER WE MISSED A CLRNC, OR ONE WAS NOT ISSUED AS THE CTLR THOUGHT, OR THE CLRNC WAS ACCEPTED BY ANOTHER ACFT. BOTH PLTS DISTINCTLY REMEMBER CLRNC TO 6000 FT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.