Narrative:

During a visual approach to runway 11 at ewr, approach control (127.6) told us to contact ewr tower (118.3) then controller indicated to stay with him. The first officer having just completed IOE was having difficulty slowing and configuring the aircraft. My attention was directed toward helping him with the approach. In doing so, I could not remember if a landing clearance was received. At touchdown, I realized that a landing clearance may have not been granted. The landing clearance may have been issued by approach as they sometimes do when visual approachs to runway 11 are in progress. Nothing was said by the ground controller on taxi in or chief pilots. Contributing factors I believe were controller not switching us to tower at usual turnover point in addition to high level of activity in cockpit.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: COMMUTER ACFT ON VISUAL APCH MAKES LNDG WITHOUT CLRNC.

Narrative: DURING A VISUAL APCH TO RWY 11 AT EWR, APCH CTL (127.6) TOLD US TO CONTACT EWR TWR (118.3) THEN CTLR INDICATED TO STAY WITH HIM. THE FO HAVING JUST COMPLETED IOE WAS HAVING DIFFICULTY SLOWING AND CONFIGURING THE ACFT. MY ATTN WAS DIRECTED TOWARD HELPING HIM WITH THE APCH. IN DOING SO, I COULD NOT REMEMBER IF A LNDG CLRNC WAS RECEIVED. AT TOUCHDOWN, I REALIZED THAT A LNDG CLRNC MAY HAVE NOT BEEN GRANTED. THE LNDG CLRNC MAY HAVE BEEN ISSUED BY APCH AS THEY SOMETIMES DO WHEN VISUAL APCHS TO RWY 11 ARE IN PROGRESS. NOTHING WAS SAID BY THE GND CTLR ON TAXI IN OR CHIEF PLTS. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS I BELIEVE WERE CTLR NOT SWITCHING US TO TWR AT USUAL TURNOVER POINT IN ADDITION TO HIGH LEVEL OF ACTIVITY IN COCKPIT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.