Narrative:

Approach told us to follow commuter. Tower told us to follow air carrier MD80 who was well behind and above us. Tower told us to s-turn towards the west for spacing. After the s-turn it became apparent that spacing was tight (very tight). I asked tower if MD80 would hold short of our runway, they said 'yes.' if they had said no, I would have gone around. However, since they said yes and we were cleared to land, I continued with the landing. Both my aircraft and the air carrier jet ended up in the runway 33 and runway 36 intersection within 50 ft of each other. I feel that the tower controller put us in an unsafe position and that separation was lost.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: COMMUTER ACFT ON VISUAL APCH MUST S-TURN FOR SPACING AND STILL ENDS UP ONLY 50 FT FROM MD80 ON INTERSECTING RWYS ON LNDG ROLL.

Narrative: APCH TOLD US TO FOLLOW COMMUTER. TWR TOLD US TO FOLLOW ACR MD80 WHO WAS WELL BEHIND AND ABOVE US. TWR TOLD US TO S-TURN TOWARDS THE W FOR SPACING. AFTER THE S-TURN IT BECAME APPARENT THAT SPACING WAS TIGHT (VERY TIGHT). I ASKED TWR IF MD80 WOULD HOLD SHORT OF OUR RWY, THEY SAID 'YES.' IF THEY HAD SAID NO, I WOULD HAVE GONE AROUND. HOWEVER, SINCE THEY SAID YES AND WE WERE CLRED TO LAND, I CONTINUED WITH THE LNDG. BOTH MY ACFT AND THE ACR JET ENDED UP IN THE RWY 33 AND RWY 36 INTXN WITHIN 50 FT OF EACH OTHER. I FEEL THAT THE TWR CTLR PUT US IN AN UNSAFE POS AND THAT SEPARATION WAS LOST.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.