37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 350885 |
Time | |
Date | 199610 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : ves |
State Reference | OH |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | instruction : instructor |
Qualification | other other : other pilot : instrument pilot : cfi pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 270 flight time total : 1660 flight time type : 300 |
ASRS Report | 350885 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | instruction : trainee |
Qualification | pilot : student |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
This was to be the last dual instructional flight for my primary student prior to his private chkride and we were practicing some maneuvers. However, we had experienced difficulty starting the aircraft for our initial departure from 3i7 to ves. Consultation with the mechanic on duty led us to believe that a weak battery was the culprit and he hand- propped our plane. We expected the low battery to be charging throughout the flight, and even when I saw the alternator gauge showing no major charge going to the battery, I did not realize that the battery was not the problem. At ves, I elected to simulate an engine failure during the takeoff roll, never expecting for the airplane to become airborne, and the 4500 ft long runway was more than adequate for the maneuver. Never before had I simulated an engine failure by pulling the mixture, instead I would retard the throttle to idle. This time I pulled the mixture. The student did become airborne in ground effect about 2 ft AGL, but he handled the situation properly. Then I put the mixture back into the rich position with the propellers still windmilling, expecting the engine to fire immediately. It didn't. The engine and propellers just stopped. As I it turned out, the battery was not the problem. It was a bad starter motor. And now the starter would not even turn the propeller. Neither of us had any experience hand-propping, so we pushed the aircraft out of the way onto (or rather adjacent to) the parallel taxiway and I issued a NOTAM concerning the aircraft and its parked location at ves. Pulling the mixture was not a good idea and I will not do that again. However, once the engine had quit, I'm glad we had the resolve not to try hand- propping in an effort to get home. It's a lot better to endure some inconvenience than to lose an arm trying to hand-propeller an airplane for the first time in the dark.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLT INSTRUCTOR IN AN SMA SEL GIVES A SIMULATED ENG FAILURE TO A STUDENT PLT DURING TKOF ROLL RESULTING IN THE COMPLETE ENG STOPPAGE. EVEN THOUGH THE ACFT BECAME AIRBORNE A FEW FT, IT WAS STOPPED SAFELY ON THE RWY AND THEN PUSHED OFF ON TO THE SIDE.
Narrative: THIS WAS TO BE THE LAST DUAL INSTRUCTIONAL FLT FOR MY PRIMARY STUDENT PRIOR TO HIS PVT CHKRIDE AND WE WERE PRACTICING SOME MANEUVERS. HOWEVER, WE HAD EXPERIENCED DIFFICULTY STARTING THE ACFT FOR OUR INITIAL DEP FROM 3I7 TO VES. CONSULTATION WITH THE MECH ON DUTY LED US TO BELIEVE THAT A WEAK BATTERY WAS THE CULPRIT AND HE HAND- PROPPED OUR PLANE. WE EXPECTED THE LOW BATTERY TO BE CHARGING THROUGHOUT THE FLT, AND EVEN WHEN I SAW THE ALTERNATOR GAUGE SHOWING NO MAJOR CHARGE GOING TO THE BATTERY, I DID NOT REALIZE THAT THE BATTERY WAS NOT THE PROB. AT VES, I ELECTED TO SIMULATE AN ENG FAILURE DURING THE TKOF ROLL, NEVER EXPECTING FOR THE AIRPLANE TO BECOME AIRBORNE, AND THE 4500 FT LONG RWY WAS MORE THAN ADEQUATE FOR THE MANEUVER. NEVER BEFORE HAD I SIMULATED AN ENG FAILURE BY PULLING THE MIXTURE, INSTEAD I WOULD RETARD THE THROTTLE TO IDLE. THIS TIME I PULLED THE MIXTURE. THE STUDENT DID BECOME AIRBORNE IN GND EFFECT ABOUT 2 FT AGL, BUT HE HANDLED THE SIT PROPERLY. THEN I PUT THE MIXTURE BACK INTO THE RICH POS WITH THE PROPS STILL WINDMILLING, EXPECTING THE ENG TO FIRE IMMEDIATELY. IT DIDN'T. THE ENG AND PROPS JUST STOPPED. AS I IT TURNED OUT, THE BATTERY WAS NOT THE PROB. IT WAS A BAD STARTER MOTOR. AND NOW THE STARTER WOULD NOT EVEN TURN THE PROP. NEITHER OF US HAD ANY EXPERIENCE HAND-PROPPING, SO WE PUSHED THE ACFT OUT OF THE WAY ONTO (OR RATHER ADJACENT TO) THE PARALLEL TXWY AND I ISSUED A NOTAM CONCERNING THE ACFT AND ITS PARKED LOCATION AT VES. PULLING THE MIXTURE WAS NOT A GOOD IDEA AND I WILL NOT DO THAT AGAIN. HOWEVER, ONCE THE ENG HAD QUIT, I'M GLAD WE HAD THE RESOLVE NOT TO TRY HAND- PROPPING IN AN EFFORT TO GET HOME. IT'S A LOT BETTER TO ENDURE SOME INCONVENIENCE THAN TO LOSE AN ARM TRYING TO HAND-PROP AN AIRPLANE FOR THE FIRST TIME IN THE DARK.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.