37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 357825 |
Time | |
Date | 199701 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : msp |
State Reference | MN |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 6000 msl bound upper : 6500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : msp |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | DC-9 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
Route In Use | departure other departure sid : sid enroute : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent other |
Route In Use | arrival other enroute : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : flight engineer |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 180 flight time total : 6700 flight time type : 2000 |
ASRS Report | 357825 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | altitude deviation : overshoot conflict : nmac non adherence : clearance other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance flight crew : took evasive action other |
Consequence | Other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 0 vertical : 550 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation Inter Facility Coordination Failure |
Narrative:
I was the PF, climbing out of msp, had departed runway 11R, was on the msp 5 SID. The controller had us on a vector heading of 180 degrees, and we were cleared to climb to 7000 ft, we were told to expect to be at that altitude for a while due to numerous inbound traffic to msp -- they were changing runways to use runway 29L/29R. At approximately 6500 ft MSL, I noticed TA on the TCASII less than 1000 ft above, and descending at 1-2 O'clock position, less than 1 mi. Just then ATC (msp departure control) issued us an immediate descent to 6000 ft. At the same time, TCASII gave us an RA to descend. I disengaged the autoplt, retarded the throttles, and descended to 6000 ft MSL, we reported level at 6000 ft. We estimate aircraft passed over top of us at about 500-600 ft. ATC then said the conflict aircraft was supposed to descend to 8000 ft MSL, and had gone through assigned 8000 ft MSL. A contributing factor may have been runway 11 departures with arrs being vectored for runway change to runway 29 arrs/departures.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: DEP CLBING ARR DSNDING TFC IN A NMAC TFC CONFLICT. ACFT Y ALTDEV ALT OVERSHOT IN DSCNT.
Narrative: I WAS THE PF, CLBING OUT OF MSP, HAD DEPARTED RWY 11R, WAS ON THE MSP 5 SID. THE CTLR HAD US ON A VECTOR HEADING OF 180 DEGS, AND WE WERE CLRED TO CLB TO 7000 FT, WE WERE TOLD TO EXPECT TO BE AT THAT ALT FOR A WHILE DUE TO NUMEROUS INBOUND TFC TO MSP -- THEY WERE CHANGING RWYS TO USE RWY 29L/29R. AT APPROX 6500 FT MSL, I NOTICED TA ON THE TCASII LESS THAN 1000 FT ABOVE, AND DSNDING AT 1-2 O'CLOCK POS, LESS THAN 1 MI. JUST THEN ATC (MSP DEP CTL) ISSUED US AN IMMEDIATE DSCNT TO 6000 FT. AT THE SAME TIME, TCASII GAVE US AN RA TO DSND. I DISENGAGED THE AUTOPLT, RETARDED THE THROTTLES, AND DSNDED TO 6000 FT MSL, WE RPTED LEVEL AT 6000 FT. WE ESTIMATE ACFT PASSED OVER TOP OF US AT ABOUT 500-600 FT. ATC THEN SAID THE CONFLICT ACFT WAS SUPPOSED TO DSND TO 8000 FT MSL, AND HAD GONE THROUGH ASSIGNED 8000 FT MSL. A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR MAY HAVE BEEN RWY 11 DEPS WITH ARRS BEING VECTORED FOR RWY CHANGE TO RWY 29 ARRS/DEPS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.