Narrative:

On approach to runway 18L in cvg, we were told by approach control to maintain 180 KTS to the final approach fix. I configured for landing in order to slow up as rapidly as possible once at the FAF since we were IMC on an ILS approach. Upon contact with tower at the FAF, we were told to slow immediately to our final approach speed of about 125 KTS as there would be a departure prior to our arrival. We were cleared to land runway 18L. We did not actually acquire visual contact with the runway until about 300 ft AGL and just over 1 mi out. At that time we saw the departure traffic just starting his takeoff roll. We continued the approach and touched down about 5 seconds after the takeoff traffic had lifted off. Although there was no conflict, a missed approach (go around) on our part would have put both aircraft in the WX in very close proximity. Perhaps better coordination between approach and tower would have provided better spacing between our arrival and his departure.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN ACR B767 FLC RPTED THAT THEY TOUCHED DOWN VERY SOON AFTER ANOTHER ACFT TOOK OFF. THE APCH CTLR ASKED THE FLC TO KEEP THEIR SPD UP IN IMC WX AND THEN THE ATCT LCL CTLR ASKED THE FLC TO SLOW FOR DEP TFC.

Narrative: ON APCH TO RWY 18L IN CVG, WE WERE TOLD BY APCH CTL TO MAINTAIN 180 KTS TO THE FINAL APCH FIX. I CONFIGURED FOR LNDG IN ORDER TO SLOW UP AS RAPIDLY AS POSSIBLE ONCE AT THE FAF SINCE WE WERE IMC ON AN ILS APCH. UPON CONTACT WITH TWR AT THE FAF, WE WERE TOLD TO SLOW IMMEDIATELY TO OUR FINAL APCH SPD OF ABOUT 125 KTS AS THERE WOULD BE A DEP PRIOR TO OUR ARR. WE WERE CLRED TO LAND RWY 18L. WE DID NOT ACTUALLY ACQUIRE VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE RWY UNTIL ABOUT 300 FT AGL AND JUST OVER 1 MI OUT. AT THAT TIME WE SAW THE DEP TFC JUST STARTING HIS TKOF ROLL. WE CONTINUED THE APCH AND TOUCHED DOWN ABOUT 5 SECONDS AFTER THE TKOF TFC HAD LIFTED OFF. ALTHOUGH THERE WAS NO CONFLICT, A MISSED APCH (GAR) ON OUR PART WOULD HAVE PUT BOTH ACFT IN THE WX IN VERY CLOSE PROX. PERHAPS BETTER COORD BTWN APCH AND TWR WOULD HAVE PROVIDED BETTER SPACING BTWN OUR ARR AND HIS DEP.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.