37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 396439 |
Time | |
Date | 199803 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : bhm |
State Reference | AL |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : bhm |
Make Model Name | Cessna 210 Centurion / Turbo Centurion 210C, 210D |
Operating Under FAR Part | other : unknown |
Flight Phase | ground : holding |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Cessna 152 |
Operating Under FAR Part | other : unknown |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing other |
Route In Use | arrival other |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : local |
Qualification | controller : radar pilot : private |
Experience | controller non radar : 8 controller radar : 2 flight time last 90 days : 100 |
ASRS Report | 396439 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : private pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : ground critical non adherence : published procedure non adherence : required legal separation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
I had just taken over the local position. A C152 was inbound to runway 36, I placed a C210 into position to hold on runway 36 at golf 1 intersection. The C152 landed on runway 36 at the numbers while the C210 was in position 1400 ft down runway. The C152 had never received a landing clearance. If the C152 would have questioned my actions or reminded me of an aircraft on the runway or asked for landing verification, the event would not have happened. If I would have been more diligent to the situation, then I would have prevented it. No teamwork between the pilot and the controller was established.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: LOSS OF SEPARATION WHEN A C152 LANDS WITHOUT CLRNC WHILE A C210 IS HOLDING IN POS ON THE SAME RWY AT INTXN GOLF 1.
Narrative: I HAD JUST TAKEN OVER THE LCL POS. A C152 WAS INBOUND TO RWY 36, I PLACED A C210 INTO POS TO HOLD ON RWY 36 AT GOLF 1 INTXN. THE C152 LANDED ON RWY 36 AT THE NUMBERS WHILE THE C210 WAS IN POS 1400 FT DOWN RWY. THE C152 HAD NEVER RECEIVED A LNDG CLRNC. IF THE C152 WOULD HAVE QUESTIONED MY ACTIONS OR REMINDED ME OF AN ACFT ON THE RWY OR ASKED FOR LNDG VERIFICATION, THE EVENT WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED. IF I WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE DILIGENT TO THE SIT, THEN I WOULD HAVE PREVENTED IT. NO TEAMWORK BTWN THE PLT AND THE CTLR WAS ESTABLISHED.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.