Narrative:

Experienced unsafe nose gear indication when gear lowered for landing at buf. Went through procedure, declared emergency, visually confirmed from cockpit viewer that nose gear was down and locked. Landed at buf without incident. I don't think we broke any rules, but I'm submitting this as a precaution. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the reporter stated the aircraft was a DC9-30 and the nose gear unsafe light was caused by a failed nose landing gear position sensor.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A DC9-30 ON APCH AT 3000 FT DECLARED AN EMER DUE TO A NOSE LNDG GEAR UNSAFE LIGHT CAUSED BY A FAILED NOSE GEAR POS SENSOR.

Narrative: EXPERIENCED UNSAFE NOSE GEAR INDICATION WHEN GEAR LOWERED FOR LNDG AT BUF. WENT THROUGH PROC, DECLARED EMER, VISUALLY CONFIRMED FROM COCKPIT VIEWER THAT NOSE GEAR WAS DOWN AND LOCKED. LANDED AT BUF WITHOUT INCIDENT. I DON'T THINK WE BROKE ANY RULES, BUT I'M SUBMITTING THIS AS A PRECAUTION. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE RPTR STATED THE ACFT WAS A DC9-30 AND THE NOSE GEAR UNSAFE LIGHT WAS CAUSED BY A FAILED NOSE LNDG GEAR POS SENSOR.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.