37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 431870 |
Time | |
Date | 199903 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | navaid : tay.vortac |
State Reference | GA |
Altitude | msl single value : 16000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Dusk |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zjx.artcc |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | ATR 72 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | other vortac |
Flight Phase | cruise : level |
Route In Use | approach : traffic pattern enroute : direct |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 50 flight time total : 5000 flight time type : 20 |
ASRS Report | 431870 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | airspace violation : entry non adherence : far other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued advisory flight crew : exited penetrated airspace flight crew : returned to original clearance |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
While en route tay direct to amg, ATC advised us to turn 25 degrees right immediately because we had drifted into an active MOA. We were 2-3 degrees off course at the time of ATC's instruction. According to the chart, this course deviation is not enough to put us in the MOA or even outside the confines of J85 (which goes tay direct amg although our clearance was 'direct'). ATC said nothing further about it and I wonder if the controller meant we were drifting towards the MOA. VOR checks are a maintenance function at my company but we had no other complaints from ATC during 3 other flts accomplished in the same aircraft.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ACFT VECTORED BACK ON COURSE.
Narrative: WHILE ENRTE TAY DIRECT TO AMG, ATC ADVISED US TO TURN 25 DEGS R IMMEDIATELY BECAUSE WE HAD DRIFTED INTO AN ACTIVE MOA. WE WERE 2-3 DEGS OFF COURSE AT THE TIME OF ATC'S INSTRUCTION. ACCORDING TO THE CHART, THIS COURSE DEV IS NOT ENOUGH TO PUT US IN THE MOA OR EVEN OUTSIDE THE CONFINES OF J85 (WHICH GOES TAY DIRECT AMG ALTHOUGH OUR CLRNC WAS 'DIRECT'). ATC SAID NOTHING FURTHER ABOUT IT AND I WONDER IF THE CTLR MEANT WE WERE DRIFTING TOWARDS THE MOA. VOR CHKS ARE A MAINT FUNCTION AT MY COMPANY BUT WE HAD NO OTHER COMPLAINTS FROM ATC DURING 3 OTHER FLTS ACCOMPLISHED IN THE SAME ACFT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.