37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 439270 |
Time | |
Date | 199906 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : mia.airport |
State Reference | FL |
Altitude | msl single value : 4000 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : mia.tracon |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B727-200 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | ils localizer & glide slope : 9l |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : instrument precision |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
ASRS Report | 439270 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
ASRS Report | 439269 |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance flight crew : returned to intended or assigned course |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Descending on approach to mia runway 9R, we were given a change to runway 9L. During frequency change, captain changed VOR/ILS to runway 9L on #1. I changed #2 to runway 9L ILS and verified idents on both. When I looked back to flight display, captain appeared to be on course, but my display showed ILS course to left of us. Simultaneously, approach asked us to verify we were on the localizer to runway 9L. We responded yes, while sorting out the discrepancy. Flight engineer noted captain's radar/navigation switch was still in navigation mode. Captain returned to navigation mode, and displays agreed. We followed new intercept heading given by approach back to runway 9L localizer and completed approach without incident or traffic conflict.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B727 FLC DID NOT CHANGE CDI TO ILS APCH MODE AND FAILED TO INTERCEPT THE LOC ON APCH TO MIA.
Narrative: DSNDING ON APCH TO MIA RWY 9R, WE WERE GIVEN A CHANGE TO RWY 9L. DURING FREQ CHANGE, CAPT CHANGED VOR/ILS TO RWY 9L ON #1. I CHANGED #2 TO RWY 9L ILS AND VERIFIED IDENTS ON BOTH. WHEN I LOOKED BACK TO FLT DISPLAY, CAPT APPEARED TO BE ON COURSE, BUT MY DISPLAY SHOWED ILS COURSE TO L OF US. SIMULTANEOUSLY, APCH ASKED US TO VERIFY WE WERE ON THE LOC TO RWY 9L. WE RESPONDED YES, WHILE SORTING OUT THE DISCREPANCY. FE NOTED CAPT'S RADAR/NAV SWITCH WAS STILL IN NAV MODE. CAPT RETURNED TO NAV MODE, AND DISPLAYS AGREED. WE FOLLOWED NEW INTERCEPT HDG GIVEN BY APCH BACK TO RWY 9L LOC AND COMPLETED APCH WITHOUT INCIDENT OR TFC CONFLICT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.