A C152 student pilot performs a touch-and-go on the wrong runway at sfb, fl.

Attributes
ACN	470360
Time
Date	200004
Day	Sun
Local Time Of Day	0601 To 1200
Place
Locale Reference	airport : sfb.airport
State Reference	FL
Altitude	agl single value : 0
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tower : atl.tower
Operator	general aviation : instructional
Make Model Name	Cessna 152
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Navigation In Use	other
Flight Phase	landing : touch and go landing : roll
Route In Use	approach : visual
Flight Plan	None
Person 1
Affiliation	other
Function	instruction : instructor observation : observer
Qualification	pilot : cfi pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : multi engine
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 80 flight time total : 260 flight time type : 90
ASRS Report	470360
Person 2
Affiliation	other
Function	instruction : trainee
Qualification	pilot : student
Events
Anomaly	incursion : runway non adherence : clearance non adherence : far other anomaly other
Independent Detector	other controllera other flight crewa other other : obs 1
Resolutory Action	flight crew : returned to intended or assigned course flight crew : became reoriented none taken : detected after the fact
Consequence	faa : reviewed incident with flight crew
Supplementary
Problem Areas	ATC Human Performance Airport Environmental Factor Flight Crew Human Performance
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

Student was supposed to do touch-and-go operations on runway 9C. I was in sfb tower to supervise the first solo flight. During the first part of the lesson, I was doing touch-and-goes with him and student kept moderately overshooting final for runway 9C. The tower just had a shift change and there was only light traffic. So they didn't see (me neither) that student made his first touch-and-go on runway 9L. Just after his takeoff, we saw where he was. Student told me he recognized the situation on upwind when he checked for wind drift. At 200 ft AGL, he changed the upwind leg and made a sidestep maneuver to the right for runway 9C. There were 2 other aircraft in pattern for runway 9C and none for runway 9L. Fortunately, there was no traffic on final for runway 9L. I was not instructed to file a report to the tower. Rest of flight was uneventful. Contributing factor: crosswind component from the south, maybe. Corrective action: with any further student, extremely emphasize the importance of proper, accurate traffic patterns. If they overshoot final on their first solo lesson, they won't go up alone until that problem is fixed.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A C152 STUDENT PLT PERFORMS A TOUCH-AND-GO ON THE WRONG RWY AT SFB, FL.

Narrative: STUDENT WAS SUPPOSED TO DO TOUCH-AND-GO OPS ON RWY 9C. I WAS IN SFB TWR TO SUPERVISE THE FIRST SOLO FLT. DURING THE FIRST PART OF THE LESSON, I WAS DOING TOUCH-AND-GOES WITH HIM AND STUDENT KEPT MODERATELY OVERSHOOTING FINAL FOR RWY 9C. THE TWR JUST HAD A SHIFT CHANGE AND THERE WAS ONLY LIGHT TFC. SO THEY DIDN'T SEE (ME NEITHER) THAT STUDENT MADE HIS FIRST TOUCH-AND-GO ON RWY 9L. JUST AFTER HIS TKOF, WE SAW WHERE HE WAS. STUDENT TOLD ME HE RECOGNIZED THE SIT ON UPWIND WHEN HE CHKED FOR WIND DRIFT. AT 200 FT AGL, HE CHANGED THE UPWIND LEG AND MADE A SIDESTEP MANEUVER TO THE R FOR RWY 9C. THERE WERE 2 OTHER ACFT IN PATTERN FOR RWY 9C AND NONE FOR RWY 9L. FORTUNATELY, THERE WAS NO TFC ON FINAL FOR RWY 9L. I WAS NOT INSTRUCTED TO FILE A RPT TO THE TWR. REST OF FLT WAS UNEVENTFUL. CONTRIBUTING FACTOR: XWIND COMPONENT FROM THE S, MAYBE. CORRECTIVE ACTION: WITH ANY FURTHER STUDENT, EXTREMELY EMPHASIZE THE IMPORTANCE OF PROPER, ACCURATE TFC PATTERNS. IF THEY OVERSHOOT FINAL ON THEIR FIRST SOLO LESSON, THEY WON'T GO UP ALONE UNTIL THAT PROB IS FIXED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.