37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 473678 |
Time | |
Date | 200005 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : mlb.airport |
State Reference | FL |
Altitude | agl single value : 800 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : mlb.tower |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, Low Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | descent : vacating altitude descent : intermediate altitude |
Route In Use | approach : traffic pattern |
Flight Plan | None |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : mlb.tower |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Navigation In Use | ils localizer & glide slope : 9r |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : instrument precision |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | instruction : instructor oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : multi engine |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 70 flight time total : 370 flight time type : 350 |
ASRS Report | 473678 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | instruction : trainee |
Qualification | pilot : student |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne critical non adherence : clearance |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 600 vertical : 300 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
There were about 5 airplanes in the pattern at this time, and the controller was getting nervous, refusing some airplanes into the class D momentarily. On the downwind for runway 9L, we requested a full stop on runway 9R. Tower instructed us to 'continue.' we interpreted this as an acceptance to our request to switch runways. We proceeded to runway 9R. Just before turning final, we saw another airplane on an IFR flight plan on a straight in final. We took evasive action. 1) we misunderstood the meaning of the instruction 'continue.' 2) the controller was busy and forgot to keep an eye on us, especially since we requested a runway change.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: INSTRUCTOR PLT DURING TRAINING FLT WITH A STUDENT IN A SMA SEL MISUNDERSTOOD LNDG CLRNC BY CONTINUING ON TO THE OTHER PARALLEL RWY WHERE ANOTHER ACFT WAS ON FINAL. THE RPTR TOOK EVASIVE ACTION AFTER SIGHTING THE OTHER ACFT.
Narrative: THERE WERE ABOUT 5 AIRPLANES IN THE PATTERN AT THIS TIME, AND THE CTLR WAS GETTING NERVOUS, REFUSING SOME AIRPLANES INTO THE CLASS D MOMENTARILY. ON THE DOWNWIND FOR RWY 9L, WE REQUESTED A FULL STOP ON RWY 9R. TWR INSTRUCTED US TO 'CONTINUE.' WE INTERPRETED THIS AS AN ACCEPTANCE TO OUR REQUEST TO SWITCH RWYS. WE PROCEEDED TO RWY 9R. JUST BEFORE TURNING FINAL, WE SAW ANOTHER AIRPLANE ON AN IFR FLT PLAN ON A STRAIGHT IN FINAL. WE TOOK EVASIVE ACTION. 1) WE MISUNDERSTOOD THE MEANING OF THE INSTRUCTION 'CONTINUE.' 2) THE CTLR WAS BUSY AND FORGOT TO KEEP AN EYE ON US, ESPECIALLY SINCE WE REQUESTED A RWY CHANGE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.