Narrative:

During a type ride on B300, the examiner gave me an engine failure during departure from runway 19. Due to the stress of the type ride, I started securing the engine (simulated) before 'cleaning up' the aircraft. During all of this, the examiner was telling me to fly the airplane, which I was. I cleaned the aircraft up, then started securing the engine. During this time, act tower switched us over to act departure. The examiner, who was acting as sic, delayed getting a hold of departure. I might add we were supposed to, after departure, turn to a heading. We were delayed in doing that as well. Safety of the flight was never in jeopardy. However, act departure (I believe) had to vector other aircraft around us. Tower did not remind us to switch over to departure, or tell us to turn to the heading. Supplemental information from acn 473152: while conducting a certification flight test for ATP and type rating, we were advised by ATC that he had vectored another IFR aircraft to avoid a conflict with us, because we failed to promptly execute the assigned approach procedures. We were conducting the ILS runway 19 approach at act, waco and had advised ATC the approach would terminate with a missed approach, 'assigned missed approach procedures were, climb to 2000 ft left turn to 050 degrees.' during the initial portion of the missed approach, I introduced a simulated engine failure. The applicant continued runway heading for 2-3 mi prior to beginning the left turn. We did not effectively communicate with ATC due to the workload on the flight deck. The application was completing the appropriate checklist and my attention was directed between the aircraft performance, clearing for traffic and the applicant's performance.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: BE30. REDUCED CLB RATE DUE TO A SIMULATED ENG OUT SURPRISED THE ATC CTLR. ANOTHER ACFT HAD TO BE VECTORED OUT OF THE WAY.

Narrative: DURING A TYPE RIDE ON B300, THE EXAMINER GAVE ME AN ENG FAILURE DURING DEP FROM RWY 19. DUE TO THE STRESS OF THE TYPE RIDE, I STARTED SECURING THE ENG (SIMULATED) BEFORE 'CLEANING UP' THE ACFT. DURING ALL OF THIS, THE EXAMINER WAS TELLING ME TO FLY THE AIRPLANE, WHICH I WAS. I CLEANED THE ACFT UP, THEN STARTED SECURING THE ENG. DURING THIS TIME, ACT TWR SWITCHED US OVER TO ACT DEP. THE EXAMINER, WHO WAS ACTING AS SIC, DELAYED GETTING A HOLD OF DEP. I MIGHT ADD WE WERE SUPPOSED TO, AFTER DEP, TURN TO A HDG. WE WERE DELAYED IN DOING THAT AS WELL. SAFETY OF THE FLT WAS NEVER IN JEOPARDY. HOWEVER, ACT DEP (I BELIEVE) HAD TO VECTOR OTHER ACFT AROUND US. TWR DID NOT REMIND US TO SWITCH OVER TO DEP, OR TELL US TO TURN TO THE HDG. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 473152: WHILE CONDUCTING A CERTIFICATION FLT TEST FOR ATP AND TYPE RATING, WE WERE ADVISED BY ATC THAT HE HAD VECTORED ANOTHER IFR ACFT TO AVOID A CONFLICT WITH US, BECAUSE WE FAILED TO PROMPTLY EXECUTE THE ASSIGNED APCH PROCS. WE WERE CONDUCTING THE ILS RWY 19 APCH AT ACT, WACO AND HAD ADVISED ATC THE APCH WOULD TERMINATE WITH A MISSED APCH, 'ASSIGNED MISSED APCH PROCS WERE, CLB TO 2000 FT L TURN TO 050 DEGS.' DURING THE INITIAL PORTION OF THE MISSED APCH, I INTRODUCED A SIMULATED ENG FAILURE. THE APPLICANT CONTINUED RWY HDG FOR 2-3 MI PRIOR TO BEGINNING THE L TURN. WE DID NOT EFFECTIVELY COMMUNICATE WITH ATC DUE TO THE WORKLOAD ON THE FLT DECK. THE APPLICATION WAS COMPLETING THE APPROPRIATE CHKLIST AND MY ATTN WAS DIRECTED BTWN THE ACFT PERFORMANCE, CLRING FOR TFC AND THE APPLICANT'S PERFORMANCE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.