37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 494993 |
Time | |
Date | 200012 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : sjc.airport |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | agl single value : 1500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : sjc.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737-800 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : multi engine |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 12000 flight time type : 1000 |
ASRS Report | 494993 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly |
Independent Detector | atc equipment other atc equipment : low altitude alert sys other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued alert |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
We were cleared the visual approach to runway 12R at sjc airport. There was a cloud deck just along the shore line just north of the airport and I wanted to get below it to maintain visual contact with the field. We looked a bit high while on base, so I used a higher than normal rate of descent to accomplish the above items. When we rolled out on final, we were approximately 2 dots low, but within approach parameters. We then received a low altitude alert warning from the tower asking us to check our altitude. We notified them that we were aware of our position and correcting towards the GS. I was surprised, but in retrospect glad that the system has a doublechk on our flight profile. I was not aware that the ATC system was able to make this observation and though my approach was outside of a normal 3:1 profile, this was an eye opener to me that the tolerances for approachs has changed over the yrs -- for the better I might add. In my self critique, I probably should have added a few extra mins and requested an ILS approach.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B737-800 CREW LNDG SJC DSNDED LOWER THAN NORMAL ON THE FINAL TO REMAIN VISUAL WITH ARPT AND RECEIVED A LOW ALT ALERT FROM THE CTLR.
Narrative: WE WERE CLRED THE VISUAL APCH TO RWY 12R AT SJC ARPT. THERE WAS A CLOUD DECK JUST ALONG THE SHORE LINE JUST N OF THE ARPT AND I WANTED TO GET BELOW IT TO MAINTAIN VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE FIELD. WE LOOKED A BIT HIGH WHILE ON BASE, SO I USED A HIGHER THAN NORMAL RATE OF DSCNT TO ACCOMPLISH THE ABOVE ITEMS. WHEN WE ROLLED OUT ON FINAL, WE WERE APPROX 2 DOTS LOW, BUT WITHIN APCH PARAMETERS. WE THEN RECEIVED A LOW ALT ALERT WARNING FROM THE TWR ASKING US TO CHK OUR ALT. WE NOTIFIED THEM THAT WE WERE AWARE OF OUR POS AND CORRECTING TOWARDS THE GS. I WAS SURPRISED, BUT IN RETROSPECT GLAD THAT THE SYS HAS A DOUBLECHK ON OUR FLT PROFILE. I WAS NOT AWARE THAT THE ATC SYS WAS ABLE TO MAKE THIS OBSERVATION AND THOUGH MY APCH WAS OUTSIDE OF A NORMAL 3:1 PROFILE, THIS WAS AN EYE OPENER TO ME THAT THE TOLERANCES FOR APCHS HAS CHANGED OVER THE YRS -- FOR THE BETTER I MIGHT ADD. IN MY SELF CRITIQUE, I PROBABLY SHOULD HAVE ADDED A FEW EXTRA MINS AND REQUESTED AN ILS APCH.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.