37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 497402 |
Time | |
Date | 200101 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : mhk.airport |
State Reference | KS |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : mhk.tower |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | ground : taxi |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : mhk.tower |
Make Model Name | King Air C90 E90 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : traffic pattern |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : student |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 43.5 flight time total : 58.1 flight time type : 58.1 |
ASRS Report | 497402 |
Person 2 | |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe conflict : ground critical incursion : runway non adherence : clearance non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : executed go around |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew other other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance Airspace Structure Airport Aircraft |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
I was inbound to mhk from the northwest about 10 NM when I contacted the tower. The controller reported to contact on right downwind to runway 21. This would have required me to cross the active runway at a low altitude. I responded with, 'would a left downwind to runway 21 work better?' the controller agreed and I proceeded to an uneventful landing. I stopped to check the WX, go to the bathroom, and file a new flight plan. Upon arriving back to the aircraft, I did a brief preflight inspection soon after shutting the aircraft down, line personnel told me the controller would like to talk to me on the phone. When speaking with the controller, I was informed that I had taken the active in front of a king air on final and also was asked if I understood the procedures for lost communication, and of course my response was yes, as I repeated them back. I then asked if they understood their procedures for an airplane not communicating and got no response. I think what happened was when I got the green light, the controller expected me to take off and not taxi back to the ramp. I also think the amount of traffic the controller was dealing with contributed to the incursion (5 on the ramp and 3 inbound in the pattern).
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A C172 STUDENT PLT, AFTER LOSING 2-WAY COM, PULLS OUT ON THE ACTIVE IN FRONT OF AN APCHING KING AIR. THE PLT HAD RECEIVED A BLINKING GREEN LIGHT FROM THE CTLR AT MHK, KS.
Narrative: I WAS INBOUND TO MHK FROM THE NW ABOUT 10 NM WHEN I CONTACTED THE TWR. THE CTLR RPTED TO CONTACT ON R DOWNWIND TO RWY 21. THIS WOULD HAVE REQUIRED ME TO CROSS THE ACTIVE RWY AT A LOW ALT. I RESPONDED WITH, 'WOULD A L DOWNWIND TO RWY 21 WORK BETTER?' THE CTLR AGREED AND I PROCEEDED TO AN UNEVENTFUL LNDG. I STOPPED TO CHK THE WX, GO TO THE BATHROOM, AND FILE A NEW FLT PLAN. UPON ARRIVING BACK TO THE ACFT, I DID A BRIEF PREFLT INSPECTION SOON AFTER SHUTTING THE ACFT DOWN, LINE PERSONNEL TOLD ME THE CTLR WOULD LIKE TO TALK TO ME ON THE PHONE. WHEN SPEAKING WITH THE CTLR, I WAS INFORMED THAT I HAD TAKEN THE ACTIVE IN FRONT OF A KING AIR ON FINAL AND ALSO WAS ASKED IF I UNDERSTOOD THE PROCS FOR LOST COM, AND OF COURSE MY RESPONSE WAS YES, AS I REPEATED THEM BACK. I THEN ASKED IF THEY UNDERSTOOD THEIR PROCS FOR AN AIRPLANE NOT COMMUNICATING AND GOT NO RESPONSE. I THINK WHAT HAPPENED WAS WHEN I GOT THE GREEN LIGHT, THE CTLR EXPECTED ME TO TAKE OFF AND NOT TAXI BACK TO THE RAMP. I ALSO THINK THE AMOUNT OF TFC THE CTLR WAS DEALING WITH CONTRIBUTED TO THE INCURSION (5 ON THE RAMP AND 3 INBOUND IN THE PATTERN).
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.