Narrative:

I am in receipt of a company safety report that indicates that a taxiing aircraft directed jetblast toward parking spot X at ind. Resulting damage was minor. It appears from the time and date from the report that it was not my aircraft as the report was dated hours before my blockout. During pushback, engine start, and subsequent taxi, all standard company callouts, signals, and procedures were used in proper sequence and in accordance with company directives. Taxi signals and power settings were in accordance with company established and published procedures. We maintained an outside awareness in accordance with procedure.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN MD11 CAPT RPTED THAT HE HAD BEEN FALSELY ACCUSED OF CAUSING DAMAGE, DUE TO JET BLAST, AT IND.

Narrative: I AM IN RECEIPT OF A COMPANY SAFETY RPT THAT INDICATES THAT A TAXIING ACFT DIRECTED JETBLAST TOWARD PARKING SPOT X AT IND. RESULTING DAMAGE WAS MINOR. IT APPEARS FROM THE TIME AND DATE FROM THE RPT THAT IT WAS NOT MY ACFT AS THE RPT WAS DATED HRS BEFORE MY BLOCKOUT. DURING PUSHBACK, ENGINE START, AND SUBSEQUENT TAXI, ALL STANDARD COMPANY CALLOUTS, SIGNALS, AND PROCS WERE USED IN PROPER SEQUENCE AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH COMPANY DIRECTIVES. TAXI SIGNALS AND PWR SETTINGS WERE IN ACCORDANCE WITH COMPANY ESTABLISHED AND PUBLISHED PROCS. WE MAINTAINED AN OUTSIDE AWARENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROC.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.