Narrative:

Flight planned for FL200. First officer and captain thought ZTL assigned FL220. Switched to jax and checked in climbing to FL220. Controller didn't catch mistake and made no comment. As separation decreased, we were told to descend to FL200. No comment was made that we had climbed through an assigned altitude. No TA or RA was received. We followed procedure that have both pilots point to any new altitude set and saying the new altitude. Both pilots pointed and said FL220. We both thought and read back to each other FL220. 2 notes: I found it strange that when the suspected mistake was discovered the controller never mentioned any altitude deviation. We both feel safety was never compromised as there was never a TA or RA.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A DASH 8 FLT CREW UNDERSTANDS FL220, BUT ATC SAID THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE STOPPED AT FL200.

Narrative: FLT PLANNED FOR FL200. FO AND CAPT THOUGHT ZTL ASSIGNED FL220. SWITCHED TO JAX AND CHECKED IN CLBING TO FL220. CTLR DIDN'T CATCH MISTAKE AND MADE NO COMMENT. AS SEPARATION DECREASED, WE WERE TOLD TO DSND TO FL200. NO COMMENT WAS MADE THAT WE HAD CLBED THROUGH AN ASSIGNED ALT. NO TA OR RA WAS RECEIVED. WE FOLLOWED PROC THAT HAVE BOTH PLTS POINT TO ANY NEW ALT SET AND SAYING THE NEW ALT. BOTH PLTS POINTED AND SAID FL220. WE BOTH THOUGHT AND READ BACK TO EACH OTHER FL220. 2 NOTES: I FOUND IT STRANGE THAT WHEN THE SUSPECTED MISTAKE WAS DISCOVERED THE CTLR NEVER MENTIONED ANY ALTDEV. WE BOTH FEEL SAFETY WAS NEVER COMPROMISED AS THERE WAS NEVER A TA OR RA.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.