37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 533670 |
Time | |
Date | 200112 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : atl.airport |
State Reference | GA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 3000 msl bound upper : 4000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : atl.tower |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Beechjet 400 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Navigation In Use | ils localizer & glide slope : 9r |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : instrument precision |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 40 flight time total : 2500 flight time type : 500 |
ASRS Report | 533670 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe other anomaly other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : flt management system other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance Aircraft |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
After our departure from ssi, we lost our FMS navigation. Accordingly, we advised ATC and requested vectors to our first fix. From there, we had to use VOR navigation and our backup navigation on our secondary display unit (sdu). The en route trip was IMC, and our workload was greatly increased. As we began to fly the ILS runway 9R, we began to review again the altitudes at the various mileage fixes on the approach. We had to use our backup sdu to shoot the approach (to give us both vertical and horizontal guidance). The sdu was set to the ILS frequency. We had the VOR set to atl. My copilot had his hands full flying the approach in bad WX. I was communicating, calling for checklists, and verifying altitudes and distances. When we were cleared for the approach, we were given 180 KIAS to maintain until the marker. I noticed we had slowed considerably. As I reminded the PF to keep his speed up, so did ATC. We landed without further comment from ATC. We earnestly did everything safely and as instructed, however, with options (equipment and WX) taken away a routine approach becomes extremely difficult.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: BEECH JET 400 FO FAILED TO MAINTAIN SPD ASSIGNED SPD OUTSIDE THE OM AFTER BEING CLRED FOR THE APCH.
Narrative: AFTER OUR DEP FROM SSI, WE LOST OUR FMS NAV. ACCORDINGLY, WE ADVISED ATC AND REQUESTED VECTORS TO OUR FIRST FIX. FROM THERE, WE HAD TO USE VOR NAV AND OUR BACKUP NAV ON OUR SECONDARY DISPLAY UNIT (SDU). THE ENRTE TRIP WAS IMC, AND OUR WORKLOAD WAS GREATLY INCREASED. AS WE BEGAN TO FLY THE ILS RWY 9R, WE BEGAN TO REVIEW AGAIN THE ALTS AT THE VARIOUS MILEAGE FIXES ON THE APCH. WE HAD TO USE OUR BACKUP SDU TO SHOOT THE APCH (TO GIVE US BOTH VERT AND HORIZ GUIDANCE). THE SDU WAS SET TO THE ILS FREQ. WE HAD THE VOR SET TO ATL. MY COPLT HAD HIS HANDS FULL FLYING THE APCH IN BAD WX. I WAS COMMUNICATING, CALLING FOR CHKLISTS, AND VERIFYING ALTS AND DISTANCES. WHEN WE WERE CLRED FOR THE APCH, WE WERE GIVEN 180 KIAS TO MAINTAIN UNTIL THE MARKER. I NOTICED WE HAD SLOWED CONSIDERABLY. AS I REMINDED THE PF TO KEEP HIS SPD UP, SO DID ATC. WE LANDED WITHOUT FURTHER COMMENT FROM ATC. WE EARNESTLY DID EVERYTHING SAFELY AND AS INSTRUCTED, HOWEVER, WITH OPTIONS (EQUIP AND WX) TAKEN AWAY A ROUTINE APCH BECOMES EXTREMELY DIFFICULT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.