37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 547786 |
Time | |
Date | 200205 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | navaid : zzz.vortac |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | msl single value : 3500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : zzz.tracon |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, High Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Navigation In Use | other vortac |
Flight Phase | cruise : level |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | instruction : instructor |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 40 flight time total : 2278 flight time type : 200 |
ASRS Report | 547786 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | instruction : trainee |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : oil pressure indication other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : landed as precaution |
Consequence | other other Other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | contributing factor : schedule pressure performance deficiency : fault isolation performance deficiency : inspection performance deficiency : logbook entry performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements performance deficiency : repair |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Maintenance Human Performance Aircraft Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
My student noticed the engine beginning to run rough and I saw the oil pressure gauge on the redline on the low side of the green. We notified ATC of our mechanical situation. There was a drag strip below us that was not in use at the time. We decided the best course of action would be to set it down on the drag strip rather than risk a complete loss of engine power from continuing to our home airport, ZZZ1. There were no injuries or property damage. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the reporter stated the combination of the rough running engine and low oil pressure was the reason for the emergency off field landing. The reporter said when the fixed base operator technician arrived and checked the engine it's condition was the same as in-flight, rough running and low oil pressure. The reporter stated the technician ran the engine and advised a maintenance ferry to the fixed base operators repair facility. The reporter said operating the engine with nothing done to correct its condition was not easy to accept. The reporter stated the technician assured myself and the student the engine was operable and would make the maintenance ferry with no problem. The reporter said against his better judgement the maintenance ferry was flown and accomplished. The reporter stated that he is no longer employed by this operator.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CESSNA 152 IN CRUISE AT 3500 FT DECLARED AN EMER AND MADE AN OFF FIELD LNDG DUE TO ROUGH ENG AND LOW OIL PRESSURE. AFTER MAINT INSPECTION THE AIRPLANE WAS FERRIED TO THE HOME BASE FOR REPAIRS.
Narrative: MY STUDENT NOTICED THE ENG BEGINNING TO RUN ROUGH AND I SAW THE OIL PRESSURE GAUGE ON THE REDLINE ON THE LOW SIDE OF THE GREEN. WE NOTIFIED ATC OF OUR MECHANICAL SIT. THERE WAS A DRAG STRIP BELOW US THAT WAS NOT IN USE AT THE TIME. WE DECIDED THE BEST COURSE OF ACTION WOULD BE TO SET IT DOWN ON THE DRAG STRIP RATHER THAN RISK A COMPLETE LOSS OF ENG PWR FROM CONTINUING TO OUR HOME ARPT, ZZZ1. THERE WERE NO INJURIES OR PROPERTY DAMAGE. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE RPTR STATED THE COMBINATION OF THE ROUGH RUNNING ENG AND LOW OIL PRESSURE WAS THE REASON FOR THE EMER OFF FIELD LNDG. THE RPTR SAID WHEN THE FIXED BASE OPERATOR TECHNICIAN ARRIVED AND CHKED THE ENG IT'S CONDITION WAS THE SAME AS INFLT, ROUGH RUNNING AND LOW OIL PRESSURE. THE RPTR STATED THE TECHNICIAN RAN THE ENG AND ADVISED A MAINT FERRY TO THE FIXED BASE OPERATORS REPAIR FACILITY. THE RPTR SAID OPERATING THE ENG WITH NOTHING DONE TO CORRECT ITS CONDITION WAS NOT EASY TO ACCEPT. THE RPTR STATED THE TECHNICIAN ASSURED MYSELF AND THE STUDENT THE ENG WAS OPERABLE AND WOULD MAKE THE MAINT FERRY WITH NO PROB. THE RPTR SAID AGAINST HIS BETTER JUDGEMENT THE MAINT FERRY WAS FLOWN AND ACCOMPLISHED. THE RPTR STATED THAT HE IS NO LONGER EMPLOYED BY THIS OPERATOR.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.