37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 548234 |
Time | |
Date | 200205 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : ttn.airport |
State Reference | NJ |
Altitude | msl single value : 5000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : phl.tracon tracon : n90.tracon |
Operator | general aviation : corporate |
Make Model Name | Citation Excel |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
Route In Use | departure : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : approach |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Experience | controller radar : 13 controller time certified in position1 : 0.5 |
ASRS Report | 548234 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : approach |
Events | |
Anomaly | airspace violation : entry airspace violation : exit non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | atc equipment other atc equipment : radar other controllera other controllerb |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Inter Facility Coordination Failure Intra Facility Coordination Failure Operational Deviation |
Narrative:
Aircraft was released from ttn, runway 24, runway heading. Traffic moderate, position being decombined. Target did not acquire. Flight progress strip lost while decombining position. Aircraft flew 20 mi through class B airspace at 5000 ft and was never idented. Aircraft was directly over phl when pilot inquired about a higher altitude. I was only able to radar identify the aircraft after it had passed through the main bang of the phl ASR. No transponder was observed prior to this and the aircraft had already exited my area of jurisdiction. I feel that better radar coverage is needed in the area of trenton, nj. Currently radar coverage does not exist below 3000 ft in the vicinity of ttn airport and east to the phl/N90 boundary. Also, better equipment at phl TRACON is necessary. I am hopeful that stars, being developed by xyz corporation and due to be operational at phl in nov/02, will be successful in preventing a situation like this from occurring.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: WHILE DECOMBINING POS AT PHL TRACON, CTLRS OVERLOOK A CITATION JET AIRBORNE FOR 20 MI.
Narrative: ACFT WAS RELEASED FROM TTN, RWY 24, RWY HDG. TFC MODERATE, POS BEING DECOMBINED. TARGET DID NOT ACQUIRE. FLT PROGRESS STRIP LOST WHILE DECOMBINING POS. ACFT FLEW 20 MI THROUGH CLASS B AIRSPACE AT 5000 FT AND WAS NEVER IDENTED. ACFT WAS DIRECTLY OVER PHL WHEN PLT INQUIRED ABOUT A HIGHER ALT. I WAS ONLY ABLE TO RADAR IDENT THE ACFT AFTER IT HAD PASSED THROUGH THE MAIN BANG OF THE PHL ASR. NO XPONDER WAS OBSERVED PRIOR TO THIS AND THE ACFT HAD ALREADY EXITED MY AREA OF JURISDICTION. I FEEL THAT BETTER RADAR COVERAGE IS NEEDED IN THE AREA OF TRENTON, NJ. CURRENTLY RADAR COVERAGE DOES NOT EXIST BELOW 3000 FT IN THE VICINITY OF TTN ARPT AND E TO THE PHL/N90 BOUNDARY. ALSO, BETTER EQUIP AT PHL TRACON IS NECESSARY. I AM HOPEFUL THAT STARS, BEING DEVELOPED BY XYZ CORPORATION AND DUE TO BE OPERATIONAL AT PHL IN NOV/02, WILL BE SUCCESSFUL IN PREVENTING A SIT LIKE THIS FROM OCCURRING.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.