Mooney 20J pilot has runway incursion at fcm.

Attributes
ACN	553148
Time
Date	200207
Day	Tue
Local Time Of Day	0601 To 1200
Place
Locale Reference	airport : fcm.airport
State Reference	MN
Altitude	agl single value : 0
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Operator	general aviation : personal
Make Model Name	M-20 J (201)
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	ground : taxi
Flight Plan	IFR
Aircraft 2
Controlling Facilities	tower : fcm.tower
Make Model Name	Cessna Aircraft Undifferentiated or Other Model
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	ground : takeoff roll
Person 1
Affiliation	other
Function	flight crew : single pilot
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 30 flight time total : 6000
ASRS Report	553148
Person 2
Affiliation	other
Function	flight crew : single pilot
Events
Anomaly	conflict : ground less severe incursion : runway non adherence : clearance non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure
Independent Detector	other flight crewa
Resolutory Action	none taken : detected after the fact
Consequence	faa : reviewed incident with flight crew
Supplementary
Problem Areas	Flight Crew Human Performance ATC Human Performance
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

Landed runway 9R at fcm. When taxiing from runway 9R north, I informed ground of my intention to taxi to parking. When ground directed me to taxi straight forward to parking, the transmission was momentarily 'stepped on' and ended with 'runway 9L.' my personal standard practice is to read back all hold instructions. It did not appear to me I received one at that moment and consequently crossed runway 9L, causing a cessna to abort a takeoff. The controller did not come back to me if a hold was issued. I do not dispute if a hold was or was not issued, because when stepped on, I may have missed it -- yet I was not corrected. I have since learned it was a supervised student controller and may have also unfortunately contributed to both of our dilemmas by not getting back to me when no readback took place. I feel it was not a good experience for me or the controller and could have ruined everybody's day.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: MOONEY 20J PLT HAS RWY INCURSION AT FCM.

Narrative: LANDED RWY 9R AT FCM. WHEN TAXIING FROM RWY 9R N, I INFORMED GND OF MY INTENTION TO TAXI TO PARKING. WHEN GND DIRECTED ME TO TAXI STRAIGHT FORWARD TO PARKING, THE XMISSION WAS MOMENTARILY 'STEPPED ON' AND ENDED WITH 'RWY 9L.' MY PERSONAL STANDARD PRACTICE IS TO READ BACK ALL HOLD INSTRUCTIONS. IT DID NOT APPEAR TO ME I RECEIVED ONE AT THAT MOMENT AND CONSEQUENTLY CROSSED RWY 9L, CAUSING A CESSNA TO ABORT A TKOF. THE CTLR DID NOT COME BACK TO ME IF A HOLD WAS ISSUED. I DO NOT DISPUTE IF A HOLD WAS OR WAS NOT ISSUED, BECAUSE WHEN STEPPED ON, I MAY HAVE MISSED IT -- YET I WAS NOT CORRECTED. I HAVE SINCE LEARNED IT WAS A SUPERVISED STUDENT CTLR AND MAY HAVE ALSO UNFORTUNATELY CONTRIBUTED TO BOTH OF OUR DILEMMAS BY NOT GETTING BACK TO ME WHEN NO READBACK TOOK PLACE. I FEEL IT WAS NOT A GOOD EXPERIENCE FOR ME OR THE CTLR AND COULD HAVE RUINED EVERYBODY'S DAY.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.