37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 556480 |
Time | |
Date | 200208 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : chs.airport |
State Reference | SC |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : sea.tower |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | Cessna 150 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | ground : parked |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | instruction : instructor |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : commercial pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 1100 flight time type : 400 |
ASRS Report | 556480 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot instruction : trainee |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | other other : faa inspect 3 |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew other Other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | FAA Flight Crew Human Performance Aircraft |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
After a routine training flight, my student and I were met exiting our C150L by an FAA inspector who asked to do a routine ramp inspection. After the inspection, the FAA inspector explained to us he considered the aircraft to be unairworthy due to items overlooked by my student and I during our preflight inspection. These items included missing screws, a loose tail tiedown ring, a suspected oil leak (later found none by a&P), and excessive play in the elevator center pivot bushing. I believe these things may have been noticed and reported before the flight had I done a more thorough preflight myself after my 35 hour student completed his. I will definitely keep this in mind in the future and remember student pilots may sometimes overlook things.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A FLT INSTRUCTOR AND STUDENT WERE INFORMED BY AN FAA INSPECTOR, AFTER A RAMP INSPECTION OF THEIR ACFT, THAT HE DEEMED THE ACFT NON AIRWORTHY.
Narrative: AFTER A ROUTINE TRAINING FLT, MY STUDENT AND I WERE MET EXITING OUR C150L BY AN FAA INSPECTOR WHO ASKED TO DO A ROUTINE RAMP INSPECTION. AFTER THE INSPECTION, THE FAA INSPECTOR EXPLAINED TO US HE CONSIDERED THE ACFT TO BE UNAIRWORTHY DUE TO ITEMS OVERLOOKED BY MY STUDENT AND I DURING OUR PREFLT INSPECTION. THESE ITEMS INCLUDED MISSING SCREWS, A LOOSE TAIL TIEDOWN RING, A SUSPECTED OIL LEAK (LATER FOUND NONE BY A&P), AND EXCESSIVE PLAY IN THE ELEVATOR CTR PIVOT BUSHING. I BELIEVE THESE THINGS MAY HAVE BEEN NOTICED AND RPTED BEFORE THE FLT HAD I DONE A MORE THOROUGH PREFLT MYSELF AFTER MY 35 HR STUDENT COMPLETED HIS. I WILL DEFINITELY KEEP THIS IN MIND IN THE FUTURE AND REMEMBER STUDENT PLTS MAY SOMETIMES OVERLOOK THINGS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.