37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 557750 |
Time | |
Date | 200208 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : oak.airport |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : corporate |
Make Model Name | Citation Excel |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | ground : parked |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : corporate |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : cfi pilot : atp pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 140 flight time total : 5780 flight time type : 310 |
ASRS Report | 557750 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : corporate |
Function | oversight : pic |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical maintenance problem : improper documentation maintenance problem : improper maintenance non adherence : far non adherence : company policies other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other other : maint 4 |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact none taken : unable none taken : anomaly accepted other |
Consequence | other other other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Maintenance Human Performance Company Aircraft Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Company |
Narrative:
In oma the crew performed a required preflight inspection and preparations for the day's assignment of oma-ase-oak-sjc-uud. As one of many parts of the preflight procedure, the crew compared the aircraft logbook times with the current maintenance status sheet issued. No inspections were required and all other preflight operations were ok. The crew flew the schedule, oma-ase-oak, until flight support told us to not move the aircraft to sjc until further notice. The crew was later advised that a maintenance inspection of aircraft Y was not completed at the required hourly inspection time. Maintenance and operations self-disclosed this information to the local FAA. Maintenance tried to apply for a ferry permit to fly the aircraft to its home base. This was denied by the FAA. By this time, the crew's duty day was exhausted and were given a rest period. The next day this crew airlined to our home. The aircraft remained in oak, ca. The crew had no idea an inspection was missed by maintenance department. As per the current aircraft maintenance status sheet, the aircraft was legal. Corrective actions: a better system to keep track of inspection periods. Either computerized or have 2 departments watching the aircraft times and reporting to each other when an inspection is near. A correct maintenance status sheet should be in the aircraft or provided to the crew on a weekly basis by facsimile. This is a third way to catch a mistake prior to becoming a problem.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A C560 CITATION FLC IS STRANDED IN OAK, CA, WHEN THEIR MAINT DEPT FINDS THAT THEIR ACFT IS OVERDUE FOR A CRITICAL INSPECTION WHILE ACFT IS AWAY FROM HOME BASE AT ZZZ, US.
Narrative: IN OMA THE CREW PERFORMED A REQUIRED PREFLT INSPECTION AND PREPARATIONS FOR THE DAY'S ASSIGNMENT OF OMA-ASE-OAK-SJC-UUD. AS ONE OF MANY PARTS OF THE PREFLT PROC, THE CREW COMPARED THE ACFT LOGBOOK TIMES WITH THE CURRENT MAINT STATUS SHEET ISSUED. NO INSPECTIONS WERE REQUIRED AND ALL OTHER PREFLT OPS WERE OK. THE CREW FLEW THE SCHEDULE, OMA-ASE-OAK, UNTIL FLT SUPPORT TOLD US TO NOT MOVE THE ACFT TO SJC UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE. THE CREW WAS LATER ADVISED THAT A MAINT INSPECTION OF ACFT Y WAS NOT COMPLETED AT THE REQUIRED HRLY INSPECTION TIME. MAINT AND OPS SELF-DISCLOSED THIS INFO TO THE LCL FAA. MAINT TRIED TO APPLY FOR A FERRY PERMIT TO FLY THE ACFT TO ITS HOME BASE. THIS WAS DENIED BY THE FAA. BY THIS TIME, THE CREW'S DUTY DAY WAS EXHAUSTED AND WERE GIVEN A REST PERIOD. THE NEXT DAY THIS CREW AIRLINED TO OUR HOME. THE ACFT REMAINED IN OAK, CA. THE CREW HAD NO IDEA AN INSPECTION WAS MISSED BY MAINT DEPT. AS PER THE CURRENT ACFT MAINT STATUS SHEET, THE ACFT WAS LEGAL. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: A BETTER SYS TO KEEP TRACK OF INSPECTION PERIODS. EITHER COMPUTERIZED OR HAVE 2 DEPTS WATCHING THE ACFT TIMES AND RPTING TO EACH OTHER WHEN AN INSPECTION IS NEAR. A CORRECT MAINT STATUS SHEET SHOULD BE IN THE ACFT OR PROVIDED TO THE CREW ON A WKLY BASIS BY FAX. THIS IS A THIRD WAY TO CATCH A MISTAKE PRIOR TO BECOMING A PROB.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.