Narrative:

During the first officer's preflight at the outstation, the right side nose tire was found to be worn down to the cord in one area. Maintenance control was contacted and the item recorded in the maintenance log. Contract maintenance was called to inspect the tire and, to most everyone's surprise, signed-off the tire as within limits for 1 revenue flight to a maintenance base. So, we flew passenger 1 leg back to our hub where maintenance was standing by to change the tire. That mechanic asked if we had ferried the plane in. I said 'no' because the contract mechanic had approved our 1 revenue flight. I showed our mechanic the write-up and sign-off. His response was 'bull....' the union representative I talked to about this flight was also quite skeptical about the validity of the contract mechanic's sign-off and suggested I write this report.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A CANADAIR CL65 WAS DISPATCHED IN NON COMPLIANCE WITH A R NOSE TIRE WORN BEYOND MAINT MANUAL LIMITS.

Narrative: DURING THE FO'S PREFLT AT THE OUTSTATION, THE R SIDE NOSE TIRE WAS FOUND TO BE WORN DOWN TO THE CORD IN ONE AREA. MAINT CTL WAS CONTACTED AND THE ITEM RECORDED IN THE MAINT LOG. CONTRACT MAINT WAS CALLED TO INSPECT THE TIRE AND, TO MOST EVERYONE'S SURPRISE, SIGNED-OFF THE TIRE AS WITHIN LIMITS FOR 1 REVENUE FLT TO A MAINT BASE. SO, WE FLEW PAX 1 LEG BACK TO OUR HUB WHERE MAINT WAS STANDING BY TO CHANGE THE TIRE. THAT MECH ASKED IF WE HAD FERRIED THE PLANE IN. I SAID 'NO' BECAUSE THE CONTRACT MECH HAD APPROVED OUR 1 REVENUE FLT. I SHOWED OUR MECH THE WRITE-UP AND SIGN-OFF. HIS RESPONSE WAS 'BULL....' THE UNION REPRESENTATIVE I TALKED TO ABOUT THIS FLT WAS ALSO QUITE SKEPTICAL ABOUT THE VALIDITY OF THE CONTRACT MECH'S SIGN-OFF AND SUGGESTED I WRITE THIS RPT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.