37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 592077 |
Time | |
Date | 200308 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | navaid : sjc.vor |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl single value : 5000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : nct.tracon tower : sjc.tower |
Operator | common carrier : charter |
Make Model Name | Light Transport |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 119 |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
Route In Use | departure sid : luope1.dyblo |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : charter |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 140 flight time total : 4030 flight time type : 1650 |
ASRS Report | 592077 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : charter |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : clearance non adherence : published procedure other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : provided flight assist controller : issued advisory controller : issued new clearance |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Departing sjc on IFR flight plan, we were given the loupe 1 (LOUPE1.dyblo) departure. At 1.8 DME, I confirmed with my first officer I was to intercept the 339 degree radial from sjc VOR. This was confirmed and I did so. Approximately 20 seconds later, the first officer said 'turn now to a 120 degree heading.' I did so. ATC at this time informed us we had not complied with the departure and had entered oakland's airspace. We received vectors and continued on the published departure without further event. This was my first flight with this carrier and I was presuming the first officer would guide me correctly through the departure procedure. We departed the ramp intending to go to a run-up block to complete the flight plan entering in the GPS. On taxi we were advised our takeoff clearance would be at XA05 which was 4 mins away. I glanced at the departure procedure and advised the first officer to call my turns. The first officer's workload was too high at this point and I should have pulled into the run-up block and fully reviewed my departure procedure, and we should have fully briefed before accepting a takeoff clearance. I should have slowed everything down and waited on the ground until we were fully ready and briefed to fly.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: LTT FLT CREW NEGLECTS TO REVIEW THE DEP PROC AND FLIES THE WRONG HDG DEP SJC.
Narrative: DEPARTING SJC ON IFR FLT PLAN, WE WERE GIVEN THE LOUPE 1 (LOUPE1.DYBLO) DEP. AT 1.8 DME, I CONFIRMED WITH MY FO I WAS TO INTERCEPT THE 339 DEG RADIAL FROM SJC VOR. THIS WAS CONFIRMED AND I DID SO. APPROX 20 SECONDS LATER, THE FO SAID 'TURN NOW TO A 120 DEG HDG.' I DID SO. ATC AT THIS TIME INFORMED US WE HAD NOT COMPLIED WITH THE DEP AND HAD ENTERED OAKLAND'S AIRSPACE. WE RECEIVED VECTORS AND CONTINUED ON THE PUBLISHED DEP WITHOUT FURTHER EVENT. THIS WAS MY FIRST FLT WITH THIS CARRIER AND I WAS PRESUMING THE FO WOULD GUIDE ME CORRECTLY THROUGH THE DEP PROC. WE DEPARTED THE RAMP INTENDING TO GO TO A RUN-UP BLOCK TO COMPLETE THE FLT PLAN ENTERING IN THE GPS. ON TAXI WE WERE ADVISED OUR TKOF CLRNC WOULD BE AT XA05 WHICH WAS 4 MINS AWAY. I GLANCED AT THE DEP PROC AND ADVISED THE FO TO CALL MY TURNS. THE FO'S WORKLOAD WAS TOO HIGH AT THIS POINT AND I SHOULD HAVE PULLED INTO THE RUN-UP BLOCK AND FULLY REVIEWED MY DEP PROC, AND WE SHOULD HAVE FULLY BRIEFED BEFORE ACCEPTING A TKOF CLRNC. I SHOULD HAVE SLOWED EVERYTHING DOWN AND WAITED ON THE GND UNTIL WE WERE FULLY READY AND BRIEFED TO FLY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.