37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 699071 |
Time | |
Date | 200605 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : teb.airport |
State Reference | NJ |
Altitude | msl single value : 1500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : n90.tracon |
Operator | general aviation : corporate |
Make Model Name | PC-12 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | climbout : initial |
Route In Use | departure sid : teterboro |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : corporate |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : multi engine |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 75 flight time total : 1650 flight time type : 600 |
ASRS Report | 699071 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : departure |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : published procedure non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued advisory flight crew : overcame equipment problem flight crew : returned to original clearance |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Aircraft Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
Ny departure told me I was off course and close to other traffic. Upon departure from teb on the teb 5 departure; I experienced a failure of ahrs 1 and a partial failure of pilot's EFIS resulting in total loss of pilot's artificial horizon; flight director; automatic pilot; and TCAS; which screen went totally black. Pilot's directional gyro on the secondary EFIS screen appeared to be working; but was in fact precessing. When I discovered the pilot's dg and co-pilot's dg were in conflict; I had to diagnose the problem and determine which one was correct. It would have been simpler and quicker to diagnose and correct if the pilot's dg had simply gone black also. Upon determining that the co-pilot's ahrs was more likely correct; I brought input co-pilot's ahrs into pilot's side EFIS display. Thereafter the flight instruments performed perfectly and I continued my flight without further incident. When I returned to my base; the ahrs 1 unit was found to be defective and was replaced immediately.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: PILATUS PC12 HAS THE AHRS FAIL DURING CLB ON THE TEB 5 DEP. ATC ISSUED AN ADVISORY.
Narrative: NY DEP TOLD ME I WAS OFF COURSE AND CLOSE TO OTHER TFC. UPON DEP FROM TEB ON THE TEB 5 DEP; I EXPERIENCED A FAILURE OF AHRS 1 AND A PARTIAL FAILURE OF PLT'S EFIS RESULTING IN TOTAL LOSS OF PLT'S ARTIFICIAL HORIZON; FLT DIRECTOR; AUTO PLT; AND TCAS; WHICH SCREEN WENT TOTALLY BLACK. PLT'S DIRECTIONAL GYRO ON THE SECONDARY EFIS SCREEN APPEARED TO BE WORKING; BUT WAS IN FACT PRECESSING. WHEN I DISCOVERED THE PLT'S DG AND CO-PLT'S DG WERE IN CONFLICT; I HAD TO DIAGNOSE THE PROB AND DETERMINE WHICH ONE WAS CORRECT. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN SIMPLER AND QUICKER TO DIAGNOSE AND CORRECT IF THE PLT'S DG HAD SIMPLY GONE BLACK ALSO. UPON DETERMINING THAT THE CO-PLT'S AHRS WAS MORE LIKELY CORRECT; I BROUGHT INPUT CO-PLT'S AHRS INTO PLT'S SIDE EFIS DISPLAY. THEREAFTER THE FLT INSTRUMENTS PERFORMED PERFECTLY AND I CONTINUED MY FLT WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. WHEN I RETURNED TO MY BASE; THE AHRS 1 UNIT WAS FOUND TO BE DEFECTIVE AND WAS REPLACED IMMEDIATELY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.