C310 has a runway incursion at mie.

Attributes
ACN	704285
Time
Date	200607
Local Time Of Day	0601 To 1200
Place
Locale Reference	airport : mie.airport
State Reference	IN
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tower : mie.tower
Operator	general aviation : corporate
Make Model Name	Cessna 310/T310C
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Navigation In Use	ils localizer & glide slope : 32
Flight Phase	descent : approach
Route In Use	approach : instrument precision
Flight Plan	IFR
Aircraft 2
Controlling Facilities	tower : mie.tower
Operator	general aviation : personal
Make Model Name	Cessna Aircraft Undifferentiated or Other Model
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	ground : position and hold
Person 1
Affiliation	company : corporate
Function	flight crew : first officer
Qualification	pilot : commercial pilot : multi engine
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 3950 flight time type : 1700
ASRS Report	704285
Person 2
Affiliation	company : corporate
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 35 flight time total : 7895 flight time type : 20
ASRS Report	704284
Events
Anomaly	conflict : ground less severe incursion : landing without clearance incursion : runway non adherence : clearance non adherence : far
Independent Detector	other controllerb
Resolutory Action	controller : issued alert
Consequence	faa : reviewed incident with flight crew
Supplementary
Problem Areas	Flight Crew Human Performance Airport
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance

Narrative:

We were practicing holding procedures over the FAF and were instructed to tell tower when we were to leave the hold and commence the approach. We called the tower and told the tower that we were on our outbound leg and they said to call 'balll inbound' FAF. Coming over the FAF we did not report balll inbound. Balll was not reported the tower did not know where we were. They cleared a single-cessna for departure on a crossing runway 2. At that time we were coming over the numbers on runway 32 and the tower called the other airplane to cancel their takeoff. Because they were instructed to stop the clearance because of a missed radio call and a near runway incident. We were instructed to call the tower. Supplemental information from acn 704284: after third holding pattern he said we're going to start descending on ILS runway 32 approach. Neither of us called the tower to inform that we're leaving balll inbound. I assumed he has the radio and trusted his experience not to miss something important.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: C310 HAS A RWY INCURSION AT MIE.

Narrative: WE WERE PRACTICING HOLDING PROCS OVER THE FAF AND WERE INSTRUCTED TO TELL TWR WHEN WE WERE TO LEAVE THE HOLD AND COMMENCE THE APCH. WE CALLED THE TWR AND TOLD THE TWR THAT WE WERE ON OUR OUTBOUND LEG AND THEY SAID TO CALL 'BALLL INBOUND' FAF. COMING OVER THE FAF WE DID NOT RPT BALLL INBOUND. BALLL WAS NOT REPORTED THE TWR DID NOT KNOW WHERE WE WERE. THEY CLRED A SINGLE-CESSNA FOR DEP ON A XING RWY 2. AT THAT TIME WE WERE COMING OVER THE NUMBERS ON RWY 32 AND THE TWR CALLED THE OTHER AIRPLANE TO CANCEL THEIR TKOF. BECAUSE THEY WERE INSTRUCTED TO STOP THE CLRNC BECAUSE OF A MISSED RADIO CALL AND A NEAR RWY INCIDENT. WE WERE INSTRUCTED TO CALL THE TWR. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 704284: AFTER THIRD HOLDING PATTERN HE SAID WE'RE GOING TO START DSNDING ON ILS RWY 32 APCH. NEITHER OF US CALLED THE TWR TO INFORM THAT WE'RE LEAVING BALLL INBOUND. I ASSUMED HE HAS THE RADIO AND TRUSTED HIS EXPERIENCE NOT TO MISS SOMETHING IMPORTANT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.