37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 751955 |
Time | |
Date | 200708 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : rdu.airport |
State Reference | NC |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : rdu.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737-700 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | landing : go around |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain observation : company check pilot oversight : pic |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 126 flight time type : 8000 |
ASRS Report | 751955 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : company policies other anomaly |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : executed go around flight crew : regained aircraft control |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
We had just come to the end of a long flight. The first officer was on his second day; and had already flown 2 legs. This was his third for the day. We were in a -700 and got high because of his inexperience. (We had discussed configns; techniques and computations several times and he just simply got behind.) a go around was initiated as directed by the pilot monitoring. On the go around we were vectored initially to runway 5L; and then changed to runway 5R. We did not get the localizer course set in properly and inadvertently intercepted final for runway 5L; then corrected to runway 5R. We were within parameters for the stabilized approach with 1 speed callout for low speed (slightly below reference -- correcting). The runway has a slope; and a 'firm' landing was made; but certainly within the 'norm' for company flts. The first officer is truly doing a good job and just got to the end with a not so pleasant completion to his flying for the day. Pay more attention to the 'fatigue' factor for a new first officer.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B737 CHECK AIRMAN REPORTS A PILOT ON DAY 2 OF IOE EXECUTED A GAR ON AN UNSTABILIZED APCH AND FOLLOWED WITH A FIRM TOUCHDOWN. FATIGUE A FACTOR.
Narrative: WE HAD JUST COME TO THE END OF A LONG FLT. THE FO WAS ON HIS SECOND DAY; AND HAD ALREADY FLOWN 2 LEGS. THIS WAS HIS THIRD FOR THE DAY. WE WERE IN A -700 AND GOT HIGH BECAUSE OF HIS INEXPERIENCE. (WE HAD DISCUSSED CONFIGNS; TECHNIQUES AND COMPUTATIONS SEVERAL TIMES AND HE JUST SIMPLY GOT BEHIND.) A GAR WAS INITIATED AS DIRECTED BY THE PLT MONITORING. ON THE GAR WE WERE VECTORED INITIALLY TO RWY 5L; AND THEN CHANGED TO RWY 5R. WE DID NOT GET THE LOC COURSE SET IN PROPERLY AND INADVERTENTLY INTERCEPTED FINAL FOR RWY 5L; THEN CORRECTED TO RWY 5R. WE WERE WITHIN PARAMETERS FOR THE STABILIZED APCH WITH 1 SPD CALLOUT FOR LOW SPD (SLIGHTLY BELOW REF -- CORRECTING). THE RWY HAS A SLOPE; AND A 'FIRM' LNDG WAS MADE; BUT CERTAINLY WITHIN THE 'NORM' FOR COMPANY FLTS. THE FO IS TRULY DOING A GOOD JOB AND JUST GOT TO THE END WITH A NOT SO PLEASANT COMPLETION TO HIS FLYING FOR THE DAY. PAY MORE ATTN TO THE 'FATIGUE' FACTOR FOR A NEW FO.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.