Narrative:

Possible descent below assigned altitude prior to being cleared for visual approach. I had allowed the airplane to descend from the approach controller's assigned altitude. I believe it was not more than 300 ft prior to being advised by ATC. I immediately returned to the assigned altitude; and then reported the airport in sight. We had been given the option to change the landing runway to runway 14 after briefing and expecting to land on runway 32. The reason for this was the winds had changed to calm. I believe the added workload of switching runways caused me to become distracted. I had discussed this at length with the PIC and will in the future request a delaying vector; or remain with the original runway if the change is offered only for our convenience.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: BE40 FO DSNDS BELOW ASSIGNED ALTITUDE AFTER BEING OFFERED RWY 14 INSTEAD OF RWY 32 AT FRG IN DAY VISUAL CONDITIONS.

Narrative: POSSIBLE DSCNT BELOW ASSIGNED ALTITUDE PRIOR TO BEING CLRED FOR VISUAL APCH. I HAD ALLOWED THE AIRPLANE TO DSND FROM THE APCH CTLR'S ASSIGNED ALTITUDE. I BELIEVE IT WAS NOT MORE THAN 300 FT PRIOR TO BEING ADVISED BY ATC. I IMMEDIATELY RETURNED TO THE ASSIGNED ALTITUDE; AND THEN RPTED THE ARPT IN SIGHT. WE HAD BEEN GIVEN THE OPTION TO CHANGE THE LNDG RWY TO RWY 14 AFTER BRIEFING AND EXPECTING TO LAND ON RWY 32. THE REASON FOR THIS WAS THE WINDS HAD CHANGED TO CALM. I BELIEVE THE ADDED WORKLOAD OF SWITCHING RWYS CAUSED ME TO BECOME DISTRACTED. I HAD DISCUSSED THIS AT LENGTH WITH THE PIC AND WILL IN THE FUTURE REQUEST A DELAYING VECTOR; OR REMAIN WITH THE ORIGINAL RWY IF THE CHANGE IS OFFERED ONLY FOR OUR CONVENIENCE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.