Narrative:

We were cleared for a visual approach to runway 35L. I was 4 mi west of the OM and called for gear down. I then called for flaps up landing checklist and we found no nose gear down indication. We immediately asked for a vector back out to work the problem. We were given a 090 degree heading then 110 degrees then 175 degrees for downwind for runway 35R. Gear was recycled and we got down and 3 green. Looking back; I probably just should have turned inbound on the localizer and planned on flying the published missed approach; however; we asked and received vectors before we intercepted the runway 35L localizer. There was no conflict with any other traffic.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A300 FLT CRW EXECUTES GAR WHEN THE LNDG GEAR FAILS TO INDICATE THREE GREEN. RECYCLING RESOLVES THE PROBLEM.

Narrative: WE WERE CLRED FOR A VISUAL APCH TO RWY 35L. I WAS 4 MI W OF THE OM AND CALLED FOR GEAR DOWN. I THEN CALLED FOR FLAPS UP LNDG CHKLIST AND WE FOUND NO NOSE GEAR DOWN INDICATION. WE IMMEDIATELY ASKED FOR A VECTOR BACK OUT TO WORK THE PROB. WE WERE GIVEN A 090 DEG HDG THEN 110 DEGS THEN 175 DEGS FOR DOWNWIND FOR RWY 35R. GEAR WAS RECYCLED AND WE GOT DOWN AND 3 GREEN. LOOKING BACK; I PROBABLY JUST SHOULD HAVE TURNED INBOUND ON THE LOC AND PLANNED ON FLYING THE PUBLISHED MISSED APCH; HOWEVER; WE ASKED AND RECEIVED VECTORS BEFORE WE INTERCEPTED THE RWY 35L LOC. THERE WAS NO CONFLICT WITH ANY OTHER TFC.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of May 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.