Narrative:

Received aircraft with an MEL the was bastardized by maintenance (ie, paragraph # not exist in the book). Called maintenance by phone and they said they did an engineering change (paperwork type) for the flight and it was legal to fly it, so I did. I had to rely on them that this was the proper sign off in the logbook. Trusting maintenance these days is sometimes very difficult. I wish I had an answer to dereg. Analyst note: MEL item was one fire detector loop inoperative.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ACFT WAS RELEASED FOR FLT BUT WAS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH MEL.

Narrative: RECEIVED ACFT WITH AN MEL THE WAS BASTARDIZED BY MAINT (IE, PARAGRAPH # NOT EXIST IN THE BOOK). CALLED MAINT BY PHONE AND THEY SAID THEY DID AN ENGINEERING CHANGE (PAPERWORK TYPE) FOR THE FLT AND IT WAS LEGAL TO FLY IT, SO I DID. I HAD TO RELY ON THEM THAT THIS WAS THE PROPER SIGN OFF IN THE LOGBOOK. TRUSTING MAINT THESE DAYS IS SOMETIMES VERY DIFFICULT. I WISH I HAD AN ANSWER TO DEREG. ANALYST NOTE: MEL ITEM WAS ONE FIRE DETECTOR LOOP INOP.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.