37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 890133 |
Time | |
Date | 201005 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | IAD.Tower |
State Reference | DC |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Takeoff |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Local |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Ground Conflict Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
The runway configuration was south; landing runways 19L 19R & 12; departing runway 19L. I was working runway 19L arrivals/departures. My plan in this situation was to get air carrier Y; off in a 5 mile gap between two successive arrivals; the succeeding arrival being air carrier X. Upon initial contact with air carrier X I instructed him to reduce speed and advised him about the departure. A few seconds later I instructed air carrier X to make an 'south' turn. When the previous arrival crossed the landing threshold; I put air carrier Y in position on runway 19L. While the previous arrival was rolling out; I issued landing clearance to air carrier X as it appeared spacing would be adequate. When the arrival cleared the runway; I cleared air carrier Y for an immediate take-off. The departure did not appear to be gaining speed as quickly as I had anticipated and I thought I may have to send air carrier X around. I issued go-around instructions to air carrier X and then immediately rescinded them and cleared him to land again as the departure had rotated. Air carrier X landed. Recommendation; unfortunately; operating with a tailwind to increase airport capacity is all too common at iad. The problem is not that aircraft land and depart with the tailwind component; the problem is in using the same runway to land & depart given the additional runway occupancy time per operation. That said; in this situation; attention to aircraft performance characteristics; outside air temperature (hot day); and ground speeds on final are very important. With three runways available for landing; I recommend additional spacing be provided to the single departure runway; especially when a tailwind is present. Also; better utilization of the other two arrival runways would allow for a more efficient overall operation.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: IAD Local Controller described a minimal arrival/departure separation event listing adding increased arrival spacing is required during tailwind operations.
Narrative: The runway configuration was south; landing Runways 19L 19R & 12; departing Runway 19L. I was working Runway 19L arrivals/departures. My plan in this situation was to get Air Carrier Y; off in a 5 mile gap between two successive arrivals; the succeeding arrival being Air Carrier X. Upon initial contact with Air Carrier X I instructed him to reduce speed and advised him about the departure. A few seconds later I instructed Air Carrier X to make an 'S' turn. When the previous arrival crossed the landing threshold; I put Air Carrier Y in position on Runway 19L. While the previous arrival was rolling out; I issued landing clearance to Air Carrier X as it appeared spacing would be adequate. When the arrival cleared the runway; I cleared Air Carrier Y for an immediate take-off. The departure did not appear to be gaining speed as quickly as I had anticipated and I thought I may have to send Air Carrier X around. I issued go-around instructions to Air Carrier X and then immediately rescinded them and cleared him to land again as the departure had rotated. Air Carrier X landed. Recommendation; unfortunately; operating with a tailwind to increase airport capacity is all too common at IAD. The problem is not that aircraft land and depart with the tailwind component; the problem is in using the same runway to land & depart given the additional runway occupancy time per operation. That said; in this situation; attention to aircraft performance characteristics; outside air temperature (hot day); and ground speeds on final are very important. With three runways available for landing; I recommend additional spacing be provided to the single departure runway; especially when a tailwind is present. Also; better utilization of the other two arrival runways would allow for a more efficient overall operation.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.