37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 916645 |
Time | |
Date | 201011 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | HNL.Airport |
State Reference | HI |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B747 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | PA-28 Cherokee/Archer/Dakota/Pillan/Warrior |
Flight Phase | Takeoff |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Local |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Events | |
Anomaly | Conflict Ground Conflict Critical Deviation - Procedural Clearance Ground Incursion Runway |
Narrative:
Aircraft Y landed on runway 8L and was approaching taxiway Y. The aircraft was advised to turn left and contact ground control. Aircraft X; in position on runway 4L; was cleared for take-off. The developmental then cleared an aircraft into position on runway 8R. As the developmental and myself turned to check on the status of aircraft X; we both observed aircraft Y still on runway 8L passing taxiway east. The developmental advised aircraft Y to hold short of runway 4L; with no response received. I then keyed over the developmental and told aircraft X to turn right. Aircraft X was airborne prior to taxiway east and began the right turn to avoid the B747. As the B747 passed the lahso bars on runway 8L; aircraft X had completed an eastbound turn to avoid conflict. Aircraft Y then began to turn left at taxiway K and was still not responding to our transmissions. The aircraft seemed disoriented and then eventually called ground control (ground control) to advise where they were actually parking. Aircraft Y was then transferred back to our frequency on local control and crossed runway's 8L; 4L & 4R. Recommendation; company Y aircraft are not strangers to hnl/hik; however; in the future I will be more cognizant of the aircraft handling and pilot capabilities. I de-briefed the developmental and emphasized the need to follow-up and even though the pilot reads back correctly; visually confirm as a good operating practice!
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: HNL Controller described a near conflict event when traffic landing Runway 8L failed to exit the runway as instructed at Taxiway Y and traffic on Runway 4L was cleared for take off.
Narrative: Aircraft Y landed on Runway 8L and was approaching Taxiway Y. The aircraft was advised to turn left and contact Ground Control. Aircraft X; in position on Runway 4L; was cleared for take-off. The Developmental then cleared an aircraft into position on Runway 8R. As the Developmental and myself turned to check on the status of aircraft X; we both observed aircraft Y still on Runway 8L passing Taxiway E. The Developmental advised Aircraft Y to hold short of Runway 4L; with no response received. I then keyed over the Developmental and told aircraft X to turn right. Aircraft X was airborne prior to Taxiway E and began the right turn to avoid the B747. As the B747 passed the LAHSO bars on Runway 8L; aircraft X had completed an eastbound turn to avoid conflict. Aircraft Y then began to turn left at Taxiway K and was still not responding to our transmissions. The aircraft seemed disoriented and then eventually called Ground Control (GC) to advise where they were actually parking. Aircraft Y was then transferred back to our frequency on LC and crossed Runway's 8L; 4L & 4R. Recommendation; Company Y aircraft are not strangers to HNL/HIK; however; in the future I will be more cognizant of the aircraft handling and pilot capabilities. I de-briefed the Developmental and emphasized the need to follow-up and even though the pilot reads back correctly; visually confirm as a good operating practice!
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.