Commuter light transport wrong runway landing.

Attributes
ACN	93890
Time
Date	198809
Day	Sat
Local Time Of Day	1201 To 1800
Place
Locale Reference	airport : bdr
State Reference	CT
Altitude	agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tower : bdr artcc : zla
Operator	common carrier : air carrier
Make Model Name	Light Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng
Flight Phase	landing other
Route In Use	approach : visual
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : cfi pilot : flight engineer pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 4200
ASRS Report	93890
Person 2
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : first officer
Qualification	pilot : commercial pilot : instrument
Events
Anomaly	incursion : landing without clearance non adherence : clearance other anomaly other
Independent Detector	other controllera
Resolutory Action	none taken : anomaly accepted none taken : detected after the fact
Consequence	Other
Supplementary
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

Having been cleared for a visual approach to runway 24 by ZNY. I positioned the aircraft for a 2 mi left base for runway 24. We contacted bdr tower and were told to report a 2 mi base for runway 24. Airspeed at this time was about 180 KTS indicated. When we reached a 2 mi base we called tower and were given a cleared to land by tower. Also at this time my first officer was having extreme difficulty in reading the proper before landing check he has only been with the company for 1 month. At this time I asked him to complete the checklist. I also began a turn to final for what I thought was runway 24. After completing the check myself and landing the airplane, I was notified by tower that we had in fact landed on runway 28 instead of runway 24.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: COMMUTER LTT WRONG RWY LNDG.

Narrative: HAVING BEEN CLRED FOR A VISUAL APCH TO RWY 24 BY ZNY. I POSITIONED THE ACFT FOR A 2 MI LEFT BASE FOR RWY 24. WE CONTACTED BDR TWR AND WERE TOLD TO RPT A 2 MI BASE FOR RWY 24. AIRSPD AT THIS TIME WAS ABOUT 180 KTS INDICATED. WHEN WE REACHED A 2 MI BASE WE CALLED TWR AND WERE GIVEN A CLRED TO LAND BY TWR. ALSO AT THIS TIME MY F/O WAS HAVING EXTREME DIFFICULTY IN READING THE PROPER BEFORE LNDG CHK HE HAS ONLY BEEN WITH THE COMPANY FOR 1 MONTH. AT THIS TIME I ASKED HIM TO COMPLETE THE CHKLIST. I ALSO BEGAN A TURN TO FINAL FOR WHAT I THOUGHT WAS RWY 24. AFTER COMPLETING THE CHK MYSELF AND LNDG THE AIRPLANE, I WAS NOTIFIED BY TWR THAT WE HAD IN FACT LANDED ON RWY 28 INSTEAD OF RWY 24.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.