![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 946164 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201104 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
| State Reference | US |
| Environment | |
| Light | Night |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Regional Jet 900 (CRJ900) |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Pilot Flying Captain |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 1 Flight Crew Total 15250 Flight Crew Type 800 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Clearance |
Narrative:
We called the airport in sight; but did not receive a response from ATC. We were cleared to 5;000 ft previously and were currently at that altitude about 10 miles from the field. I realized that ATC did not hand us off to the next frequency so we switched to the appropriate frequency; contacted ATC and received a visual approach clearance. ATC had apparently been trying to contact us. There were no apparent conflicts with other traffic; etc.it was late at night. Normally I would not be overly concerned; however; ATC was quite irritated that we were not on the appropriate frequency. I am reasonably confident that it was an oversight by ATC and not us; but it could have been our mistake. As a side note; unscientifically speaking; I would say that 90% of the mistakes that I make personally are on continuous duty overnights.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A breakdown in ATC communications resulted when either ATC or the flight crew of a CRJ-900 failed to provide and/or respond to a frequency change to Approach Control.
Narrative: We called the airport in sight; but did not receive a response from ATC. We were cleared to 5;000 FT previously and were currently at that altitude about 10 miles from the field. I realized that ATC did not hand us off to the next frequency so we switched to the appropriate frequency; contacted ATC and received a visual approach clearance. ATC had apparently been trying to contact us. There were no apparent conflicts with other traffic; etc.It was late at night. Normally I would not be overly concerned; however; ATC was quite irritated that we were not on the appropriate frequency. I am reasonably confident that it was an oversight by ATC and not us; but it could have been our mistake. As a side note; unscientifically speaking; I would say that 90% of the mistakes that I make personally are on continuous duty overnights.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.