37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 951882 |
Time | |
Date | 201105 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | SNA.Airport |
State Reference | CA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Gulfstream G200 (IAI 1126 Galaxy) |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
Route In Use | SID CHANNEL 1 |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Bonanza 35 |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 100 Flight Crew Total 10875 Flight Crew Type 1200 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict Deviation - Altitude Excursion From Assigned Altitude |
Miss Distance | Horizontal 12000 Vertical 500 |
Narrative:
I was departing on runway 19R. I was assigned the channel 1 departure procedure but; just prior to take off; the tower re-assigned a level off altitude of 4;000 MSL. After departing and leveling off at the assigned altitude; it was evident that a bonanza at a 10 to 11 o'clock position at 4;500 MSL would be an issue. ATC assigned an immediate heading change to 220 to avoid the traffic. In the turn; the bonanza traffic became a TA; then an RA and just as quickly was no longer a factor. The bonanza traffic appeared to be on flight following with TRACON. Why would TRACON or even the tower allow jet traffic to depart and follow the departure when there is known traffic crossing the path of the departure procedure with numerous jets departing john wayne airport? Even with ATC calling out the traffic for visual confirmation; a clearance still has to be obtained to depart from the clearance unless a 'resolution advisory' is experienced. The idea behind a departure procedure is to expedite the flow of traffic; and it would have made more sense to assign a substantially higher altitude than one which puts low performance aircraft on top of high performance aircraft. Poor coordination on the part of the tower and departure control were the direct cause of this resolution advisory.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: While flying the Channel 1 SID from SNA; the flight crew of a G-II received a TCAS RA with respect to a Bonanza traversing the departure corridor utilizing flight following.
Narrative: I was departing on Runway 19R. I was assigned the Channel 1 Departure Procedure but; just prior to take off; the Tower re-assigned a level off altitude of 4;000 MSL. After departing and leveling off at the assigned altitude; it was evident that a Bonanza at a 10 to 11 o'clock position at 4;500 MSL would be an issue. ATC assigned an immediate heading change to 220 to avoid the traffic. In the turn; the Bonanza traffic became a TA; then an RA and just as quickly was no longer a factor. The Bonanza traffic appeared to be on flight following with TRACON. Why would TRACON or even the Tower allow jet traffic to depart and follow the departure when there is known traffic crossing the path of the departure procedure with numerous jets departing John Wayne airport? Even with ATC calling out the traffic for visual confirmation; a clearance still has to be obtained to depart from the clearance unless a 'resolution advisory' is experienced. The idea behind a departure procedure is to expedite the flow of traffic; and it would have made more sense to assign a substantially higher altitude than one which puts low performance aircraft on top of high performance aircraft. Poor coordination on the part of the Tower and Departure Control were the direct cause of this resolution advisory.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.