37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1102389 |
Time | |
Date | 201307 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.ARTCC |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | MD-80 Series (DC-9-80) Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Pneumatic Valve/Bleed Valve |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical |
Narrative:
Tail comp temperature hi red light illuminated on climb at approximately FL200. Leveled and accomplished red box steps and the light extinguished. We declared emergency; decided return to [the airport] was best action; requested arff. Did the QRH procedures; test briefed flight attendants and PA to passengers. First officer flew aircraft and handled communication and coordination with ATC. The temperature hi red light re-illuminated and extinguished two more times; and the pres flow light also went on then off. Crash fire rescue equipment's mandate the captain land aircraft emergencies; so I took over as pilot flying and asked first officer to review and insure QRH and checklists were performed satisfactorily. We discussed factors pertinent to our situation: overweight landing; hot day; crosswind; reported wind shear; required landing distance; post landing PA; communications with command; operations contact; etc. Then concentrated on flying visual 17R; ILS backup and exited runway in front of awaiting arff. Their exterior inspection saw nothing abnormal; so we requested they follow our taxi to the gate. Maintenance came into the cockpit immediately; but no ground personnel arrived to connect positive control area on this 100-degree day; for a long time. Maintenance inspected the tail compartment and said the temperature taps were badly blackened; so the aircraft was taken out of service. Company policy leaves continued flying to the flight crew's discretion after an emergency. First officer and I discussed and noticed we were feeling fatigue effects due to the arduous emergency; and decided the safe and sensible course was to remove selves from further piloting today. Recalling my football days a hundred years ago; it took a couple post game hours before one felt bruises and damage. So it was this day. Once the whirlwind of the emergency slowed; the strain of its impact was felt and like a nicad battery; I rapidly lost all charge (well within my 14 hour duty day). Had we continued piloting; this unplugging would've coincided mid flight where we'd be handling weather; possible divert; etc.; which was the situation that day (and maybe another emergency). Company pay adjusted our schedule approximately 7 hours less than the original sequence; in essence; monetarily penalizing us for self-removal. Hopefully that's not the intent; but it's disconcerting the perceived 'reward' for our job of successfully handling a taxing and stressful emergency; is to get pay docked. This is clear financial disincentive to any pilot in the future; to self-remove after similar emergencies. Coercing a spent pilot to ride a cockpit just to protect a pay month is a severe compromise to flight safety.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: An MD-80 TAIL COMP TEMP HI warning illuminated climbing through FL200 so the QRH was completed; an emergency was declared and the flight returned to the departure where the aircraft was removed from service because of heat damage.
Narrative: TAIL COMP TEMP HI red light illuminated on climb at approximately FL200. Leveled and accomplished red box steps and the light extinguished. We declared emergency; decided return to [the airport] was best action; requested ARFF. Did the QRH procedures; TEST briefed flight attendants and PA to passengers. First Officer flew aircraft and handled communication and coordination with ATC. The TEMP HI red light re-illuminated and extinguished two more times; and the PRES FLOW light also went on then off. CFR's mandate the Captain land aircraft emergencies; so I took over as pilot flying and asked First Officer to review and insure QRH and checklists were performed satisfactorily. We discussed factors pertinent to our situation: overweight landing; hot day; crosswind; reported wind shear; required landing distance; post landing PA; communications with command; operations contact; etc. Then concentrated on flying visual 17R; ILS backup and exited runway in front of awaiting ARFF. Their exterior inspection saw nothing abnormal; so we requested they follow our taxi to the gate. Maintenance came into the cockpit immediately; but no ground personnel arrived to connect PCA on this 100-degree day; for a long time. Maintenance inspected the tail compartment and said the temperature taps were badly blackened; so the aircraft was taken out of service. Company policy leaves continued flying to the flight crew's discretion after an emergency. First Officer and I discussed and noticed we were feeling fatigue effects due to the arduous emergency; and decided the safe and sensible course was to remove selves from further piloting today. Recalling my football days a hundred years ago; it took a couple post game hours before one felt bruises and damage. So it was this day. Once the whirlwind of the emergency slowed; the strain of its impact was felt and like a NiCad battery; I rapidly lost all charge (well within my 14 hour duty day). Had we continued Piloting; this unplugging would've coincided mid flight where we'd be handling weather; possible divert; etc.; which was the situation that day (and maybe another emergency). Company pay adjusted our schedule approximately 7 hours less than the original sequence; in essence; monetarily penalizing us for self-removal. Hopefully that's not the intent; but it's disconcerting the perceived 'reward' for our job of successfully handling a taxing and stressful emergency; is to get pay docked. This is clear financial disincentive to any pilot in the future; to self-remove after similar emergencies. Coercing a spent pilot to ride a cockpit just to protect a pay month is a severe compromise to flight safety.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.