37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 146441 |
Time | |
Date | 199005 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : atw |
State Reference | WI |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 7000 msl bound upper : 7000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : grb |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Light Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng |
Flight Phase | cruise other descent : approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 250 flight time total : 3500 flight time type : 250 |
ASRS Report | 146441 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : approach |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : returned to intended course or assigned course other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Ambiguous |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
As the PNF, I was completing the inrange check which included a call to company. I told the first officer I would be off the #1 radio while using the #2 radio for our inrange call. While I was off, the first officer answered a call that was for an small aircraft twin with a similar sounding call sign. Our heading was 180 degree. The first officer turned to 060 degree which was for the small aircraft twin. When I returned to the #1 radio I assumed the 060 degree heading was our base leg for the approach. Upon querying the controller he told us the 060 degree heading was for the small aircraft twin and we were to be on a 180 degree heading. We returned west/O conflict. As per company procedure the turn to 060 degree was read back to the controller who evidently did not catch our error. This incident emphasizes the need for us all to make sure we listen up on the radio especially with the increasing volume of air traffic.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ACR COMMUTER TAKES HEADING CLRNC INTENDED FOR ANOTHER ACFT AND ATC HEARBACK FAILURE RESULTS IN HEADING DEVIATION.
Narrative: AS THE PNF, I WAS COMPLETING THE INRANGE CHK WHICH INCLUDED A CALL TO COMPANY. I TOLD THE F/O I WOULD BE OFF THE #1 RADIO WHILE USING THE #2 RADIO FOR OUR INRANGE CALL. WHILE I WAS OFF, THE F/O ANSWERED A CALL THAT WAS FOR AN SMA TWIN WITH A SIMILAR SOUNDING CALL SIGN. OUR HDG WAS 180 DEG. THE F/O TURNED TO 060 DEG WHICH WAS FOR THE SMA TWIN. WHEN I RETURNED TO THE #1 RADIO I ASSUMED THE 060 DEG HDG WAS OUR BASE LEG FOR THE APCH. UPON QUERYING THE CTLR HE TOLD US THE 060 DEG HDG WAS FOR THE SMA TWIN AND WE WERE TO BE ON A 180 DEG HDG. WE RETURNED W/O CONFLICT. AS PER COMPANY PROC THE TURN TO 060 DEG WAS READ BACK TO THE CTLR WHO EVIDENTLY DID NOT CATCH OUR ERROR. THIS INCIDENT EMPHASIZES THE NEED FOR US ALL TO MAKE SURE WE LISTEN UP ON THE RADIO ESPECIALLY WITH THE INCREASING VOLUME OF AIR TFC.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.