37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 148772 |
Time | |
Date | 199006 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : n71 |
State Reference | PA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 2000 msl bound upper : 2000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zny |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, High Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing other other |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : private |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 25 flight time total : 260 flight time type : 200 |
ASRS Report | 148772 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | observation : observer |
Qualification | pilot : private |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter : vfr in imc inflight encounter : weather non adherence : far other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa other other : unspecified |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Flew VFR to donegal springs, PA. Airport is 2-3 NM north of susquehanna river. Upon crossing the river (from the south) to land at donegal, visibility deteriorated due to haze. As I was about to turn 180 degree because of deteriorating visibility the airport appeared below. I landed on runway 27 uneventfully. Upon landing, another pilot approached me and demanded to know how I had landed at ths airport IFR. He insisted WX/visibility was IFR, noting harrisburg approach (17 NM northwest of donegal) calling 2 mi visibility in haze. I had not been monitoring harrisburg approach since I was under the TRSA. Thinking back on this arrival and landing I made several mistakes. I should have monitored harrisburg for their visibility and flight handling at this airport (donegal has an IFR approach I'm told). I should have turned 180 degree west/O fail when IMC seemed likely and imminent. I was in a hurry to get there. I put myself in 'landing expectation' thought process. What really shook me the most about this arrival/landing is the possibility of colliding or interfering with IFR landing aircraft. I had made a 'bad' decision to continue toward my destination by using my LORAN to help me find the airport where the sunlight and haze reduced visibility. Lastly, there seems to be an unspoken rule about what constitutes 3 mi and VFR visibility. Since I've yet to meet an instrument who can demonstrate 3 mi visibility on a clear day, this judgement of what's VFR WX can be subjective. I feel I fell into this trap.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: VFR FLT IN IMC FOR LOW TIME GA PLT.
Narrative: FLEW VFR TO DONEGAL SPRINGS, PA. ARPT IS 2-3 NM N OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER. UPON XING THE RIVER (FROM THE S) TO LAND AT DONEGAL, VISIBILITY DETERIORATED DUE TO HAZE. AS I WAS ABOUT TO TURN 180 DEG BECAUSE OF DETERIORATING VISIBILITY THE ARPT APPEARED BELOW. I LANDED ON RWY 27 UNEVENTFULLY. UPON LNDG, ANOTHER PLT APCHED ME AND DEMANDED TO KNOW HOW I HAD LANDED AT THS ARPT IFR. HE INSISTED WX/VISIBILITY WAS IFR, NOTING HARRISBURG APCH (17 NM NW OF DONEGAL) CALLING 2 MI VISIBILITY IN HAZE. I HAD NOT BEEN MONITORING HARRISBURG APCH SINCE I WAS UNDER THE TRSA. THINKING BACK ON THIS ARR AND LNDG I MADE SEVERAL MISTAKES. I SHOULD HAVE MONITORED HARRISBURG FOR THEIR VISIBILITY AND FLT HANDLING AT THIS ARPT (DONEGAL HAS AN IFR APCH I'M TOLD). I SHOULD HAVE TURNED 180 DEG W/O FAIL WHEN IMC SEEMED LIKELY AND IMMINENT. I WAS IN A HURRY TO GET THERE. I PUT MYSELF IN 'LNDG EXPECTATION' THOUGHT PROCESS. WHAT REALLY SHOOK ME THE MOST ABOUT THIS ARR/LNDG IS THE POSSIBILITY OF COLLIDING OR INTERFERING WITH IFR LNDG ACFT. I HAD MADE A 'BAD' DECISION TO CONTINUE TOWARD MY DEST BY USING MY LORAN TO HELP ME FIND THE ARPT WHERE THE SUNLIGHT AND HAZE REDUCED VISIBILITY. LASTLY, THERE SEEMS TO BE AN UNSPOKEN RULE ABOUT WHAT CONSTITUTES 3 MI AND VFR VISIBILITY. SINCE I'VE YET TO MEET AN INSTR WHO CAN DEMONSTRATE 3 MI VISIBILITY ON A CLR DAY, THIS JUDGEMENT OF WHAT'S VFR WX CAN BE SUBJECTIVE. I FEEL I FELL INTO THIS TRAP.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.