Narrative:

Practice ILS runway 4 approachs under VFR conditions at fay put approximately XA00. I was not on an IFR flight plan. I was flying the approachs under the hood with a safety pilot present. Fay's arsa was OTS. Without radar vectors to intercept the localizer, I executed the full ILS approach including the procedure turn. 2 ILS approachs were made to runway 4, both with the option. Instructions from the fay tower included reporting doone (LOM) inbound. During the first approach, runway 4 was the active runway. During the second approach, the active runway changed to runway 22 and the tower informed me I may be required to complete the ILS runway 4 approach with a landing on runway 22. During this same approach, I did not inform the fay control tower when I was doone inbound. At the decision ht for runway 4, I removed the hood and discovered that another aircraft that had been inbound to runway 22 had landed and was at the midpoint on the runway. I executed the missed approach at the same time the tower admonished me for not reporting doone inbound. This situation was neither threatening to my aircraft nor the one on the runway. However, the situation did cause excitement in the control tower. The contributing factors were failure to provide a position report when doone inbound and my safety pilot not informing me to break off the approach due to traffic on the runway. Supplemental information from acn 241987: ATC radar OTS. Runway changing from 4 to 22. Pilot's failure to call the LOM inbound. Safety pilot did not take charge when report not made or later when airliner landed on runway and pilot continued approach. Safety pilot reluctant to interrupt pilot. Tower controller's attention diverted by landing aircraft and building fire in progress 5 mi northwest of airport. I have avoided giving the impression of trying to assume the role of aircraft commander. In 17 yrs of flying and trying to become an aviator I have not seen any material on the duties of a safety pilot. In this case, I allowed my duties to condense to the minimum and did not supervise enough.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: NON ADHERENCE TO ATC CLRNC INSTRUCTION RESULTS IN APCH TO OCCUPIED RWY AFTER UNAUTH PENETRATION OF AIRSPACE. PROX TO ATA.

Narrative: PRACTICE ILS RWY 4 APCHS UNDER VFR CONDITIONS AT FAY PUT APPROX XA00. I WAS NOT ON AN IFR FLT PLAN. I WAS FLYING THE APCHS UNDER THE HOOD WITH A SAFETY PLT PRESENT. FAY'S ARSA WAS OTS. WITHOUT RADAR VECTORS TO INTERCEPT THE LOC, I EXECUTED THE FULL ILS APCH INCLUDING THE PROC TURN. 2 ILS APCHS WERE MADE TO RWY 4, BOTH WITH THE OPTION. INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE FAY TWR INCLUDED RPTING DOONE (LOM) INBOUND. DURING THE FIRST APCH, RWY 4 WAS THE ACTIVE RWY. DURING THE SECOND APCH, THE ACTIVE RWY CHANGED TO RWY 22 AND THE TWR INFORMED ME I MAY BE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE ILS RWY 4 APCH WITH A LNDG ON RWY 22. DURING THIS SAME APCH, I DID NOT INFORM THE FAY CTL TWR WHEN I WAS DOONE INBOUND. AT THE DECISION HT FOR RWY 4, I REMOVED THE HOOD AND DISCOVERED THAT ANOTHER ACFT THAT HAD BEEN INBOUND TO RWY 22 HAD LANDED AND WAS AT THE MIDPOINT ON THE RWY. I EXECUTED THE MISSED APCH AT THE SAME TIME THE TWR ADMONISHED ME FOR NOT RPTING DOONE INBOUND. THIS SIT WAS NEITHER THREATENING TO MY ACFT NOR THE ONE ON THE RWY. HOWEVER, THE SIT DID CAUSE EXCITEMENT IN THE CTL TWR. THE CONTRIBUTING FACTORS WERE FAILURE TO PROVIDE A POS RPT WHEN DOONE INBOUND AND MY SAFETY PLT NOT INFORMING ME TO BREAK OFF THE APCH DUE TO TFC ON THE RWY. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 241987: ATC RADAR OTS. RWY CHANGING FROM 4 TO 22. PLT'S FAILURE TO CALL THE LOM INBOUND. SAFETY PLT DID NOT TAKE CHARGE WHEN RPT NOT MADE OR LATER WHEN AIRLINER LANDED ON RWY AND PLT CONTINUED APCH. SAFETY PLT RELUCTANT TO INTERRUPT PLT. TWR CTLR'S ATTN DIVERTED BY LNDG ACFT AND BUILDING FIRE IN PROGRESS 5 MI NW OF ARPT. I HAVE AVOIDED GIVING THE IMPRESSION OF TRYING TO ASSUME THE ROLE OF ACFT COMMANDER. IN 17 YRS OF FLYING AND TRYING TO BECOME AN AVIATOR I HAVE NOT SEEN ANY MATERIAL ON THE DUTIES OF A SAFETY PLT. IN THIS CASE, I ALLOWED MY DUTIES TO CONDENSE TO THE MINIMUM AND DID NOT SUPERVISE ENOUGH.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.