Unauthorized runway use for landing by air carrier large transport.

Attributes
ACN	246384
Time
Date	199307
Day	Fri
Local Time Of Day	1801 To 2400
Place
Locale Reference	airport : tul
State Reference	OK
Altitude	agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Operator	common carrier : air carrier
Make Model Name	Large Transport, Low Wing, 3 Turbojet Eng
Flight Phase	descent : approach landing other
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 20000 flight time type : 5000
ASRS Report	246384
Person 2
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : first officer
Qualification	pilot : instrument pilot : flight engineer pilot : commercial
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 206 flight time total : 2700 flight time type : 1200
ASRS Report	246595
Events
Anomaly	incursion : landing without clearance non adherence other
Independent Detector	other flight crewa
Resolutory Action	none taken : detected after the fact
Consequence	Other
Supplementary
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

Landing at tul with runway 18L/36R closed. Runway 26 was the active at the time with winds reported to be 150/12. We looked up 18R in our airport analysis and found that our landing weight was well below the maximum landing weight for that runway. We requested 18R, with a slight crosswind, rather than 26 with a crosswind and a tailwind. Landing was normal. In operations, we looked again at our air carrier airport pages and found that 18R was not to be used for takeoff or landing. Another aircraft reported some wind shear on takeoff from runway 26. Oversight is the key word and all available aids should be used when conditions are not normal.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: UNAUTH RWY USE FOR LNDG BY ACR LGT.

Narrative: LNDG AT TUL WITH RWY 18L/36R CLOSED. RWY 26 WAS THE ACTIVE AT THE TIME WITH WINDS RPTED TO BE 150/12. WE LOOKED UP 18R IN OUR ARPT ANALYSIS AND FOUND THAT OUR LNDG WT WAS WELL BELOW THE MAX LNDG WT FOR THAT RWY. WE REQUESTED 18R, WITH A SLIGHT XWIND, RATHER THAN 26 WITH A XWIND AND A TAILWIND. LNDG WAS NORMAL. IN OPS, WE LOOKED AGAIN AT OUR ACR ARPT PAGES AND FOUND THAT 18R WAS NOT TO BE USED FOR TKOF OR LNDG. ANOTHER ACFT RPTED SOME WIND SHEAR ON TKOF FROM RWY 26. OVERSIGHT IS THE KEY WORD AND ALL AVAILABLE AIDS SHOULD BE USED WHEN CONDITIONS ARE NOT NORMAL.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.